Disabled Resources Center, Inc.

What the center reported

2,028Consumers served36 carried over, 1,992 new
2,983Information and referral contacts
$1,821,193Total income
$0Part B
$102,924Part C
4,984Goals achievedof 5,116 set
3Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$102,924
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$528,731
State government funds	$696,200
Local government funds	$10,000
Private and other	$483,338
Total income	$1,821,193

Eight years of reports

Disabled Resources Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	984	$825,486	$0	$80,841	3
2017	967	$908,497	$0	$80,868	2
2018	1,150	$988,478	$0	$91,069	4
2019	1,875	$1,210,799	$0	$93,804	5
2020	3,617	$1,261,737	$0	$93,804	9
2021	2,817	$1,268,072	$0	$93,745	5
2022	2,041	$1,292,396	$0	$94,744	4
2023	2,028	$1,821,193	$0	$102,924	3

Consumers served, by year

2016984
2017967
20181,150
20191,875
20203,617
20212,817
20222,041
20232,028

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$898	93th	95th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$365	98th	97th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	97.4%	97th	94th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	99.4%	98th	94th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.15	25th	28th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.91	64th	65th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.1%	43th	41th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 10 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities	78.0%	50th	61th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.5 of 13.5 FTE.
Equity index	42.3	16th	12th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	24.2%	38th	40th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 5.7% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,983) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	990	990	100.0%
Preventive services	944	929	98.4%
Assistive technology	285	282	98.9%
Communication services	237	235	99.2%
IL skills training	222	208	93.7%
Mobility training	157	152	96.8%
Personal assistance	109	109	100.0%
Youth transition	98	89	90.8%
Advocacy and legal services	94	85	90.4%
Vocational services	64	61	95.3%
Family services	21	21	100.0%
Children's services	11	11	100.0%
Peer counseling	9	7	77.8%
Counseling and related services	4	4	100.0%
Other services	1	1	100.0%
All services	3,246	3,184	98.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 85 of 94 requests filled (90.4%).
Youth transition: 89 of 98 requests filled (90.8%).
IL skills training: 208 of 222 requests filled (93.7%).
Vocational services: 61 of 64 requests filled (95.3%).
Mobility training: 152 of 157 requests filled (96.8%).
Preventive services: 929 of 944 requests filled (98.4%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	1,904	1,865	27
Communication	158	152	6
Mobility and transportation	131	121	9
Community-based living	157	150	5
Educational	1,061	1,032	21
Vocational	54	36	16
Self-care	397	393	4
Information access and technology	529	517	10
Personal resource management	690	683	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	3	0
Community and social participation	32	32	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	32
5 to 19	164
20 to 24	102
25 to 59	939
60 and older	789
Age unavailable	2

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	110
Mental or emotional	117
Physical	1,369
Hearing	11
Vision	29
Multiple disabilities	155
Other	237

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 45 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	243	12.3%	42.3%	0.29
Black or African American	401	20.2%	6.4%	3.18
American Indian or Alaska Native	11	0.6%	1.2%	0.46
Asian	649	32.7%	10.2%	3.21
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	9	0.5%	0.4%	1.28
Two or more races	8	0.4%	11.9%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	662	33.4%	27.6%	1.21

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.