Center for Disabilities

What the center reported

530Consumers served401 carried over, 129 new
1,420Information and referral contacts
$2,194,648Total income
$31,087Part B
$141,602Part C
657Goals achievedof 788 set
21Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$31,087
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$141,602
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$908,214
Local government funds	$61,294
Private and other	$1,052,451
Total income	$2,194,648

Eight years of reports

Center for Disabilities by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	489	$924,357	$17,115	$103,639	7
2017	501	$1,505,547	$23,569	$104,782	8
2018	491	$1,733,987	$22,353	$110,750	6
2019	385	$1,794,167	$36,871	$123,563	6
2020	393	$1,840,560	$26,206	$124,013	24
2021	396	$1,870,740	$29,139	$124,848	14
2022	493	$2,047,465	$51,865	$128,668	12
2023	530	$2,194,648	$31,087	$141,602	21

Consumers served, by year

2016489
2017501
2018491
2019385
2020393
2021396
2022493
2023530

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,141	35th	71th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,340	68th	92th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	83.4%	88th	92th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	15.9%	13th	19th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	3.96	78th	81th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.83	87th	83th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	87.4%	21th	26th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	83.0%	74th	86th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	62.0%	23th	42th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 12.0 of 19.5 FTE.
Equity index	16.2	69th	63th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	20.9%	47th	53th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 7.9% of income; Part B varied by 33.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,420) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	3,985	3,745	94.0%
Vocational services	692	422	61.0%
Preventive services	496	445	89.7%
IL skills training	436	422	96.8%
Advocacy and legal services	332	242	72.9%
Communication services	331	283	85.5%
Recreational services	325	267	82.2%
Youth transition	312	294	94.2%
Mobility training	179	109	60.9%
Physical restoration	165	123	74.5%
Assistive technology	159	141	88.7%
Peer counseling	155	142	91.6%
Prostheses and orthotics	93	67	72.0%
Family services	43	32	74.4%
Personal assistance	26	24	92.3%
Children's services	5	5	100.0%
All services	7,734	6,763	87.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 109 of 179 requests filled (60.9%).
Vocational services: 422 of 692 requests filled (61.0%).
Prostheses and orthotics: 67 of 93 requests filled (72.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 242 of 332 requests filled (72.9%).
Family services: 32 of 43 requests filled (74.4%).
Physical restoration: 123 of 165 requests filled (74.5%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	76	65	11
Communication	58	52	6
Mobility and transportation	66	41	25
Community-based living	52	44	8
Educational	32	26	6
Vocational	22	14	8
Self-care	28	22	6
Information access and technology	142	135	7
Personal resource management	8	6	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	28	21	7
Community and social participation	168	153	15
Other	108	78	30

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	11
20 to 24	32
25 to 59	189
60 and older	292
Age unavailable	6

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	103
Mental or emotional	98
Physical	144
Hearing	22
Vision	96
Multiple disabilities	6
Other	61

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Colorado residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 32 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	288	57.8%	65.4%	0.88
Black or African American	27	5.4%	3.8%	1.43
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	1.2%	1.3%	0.96
Asian	1	0.2%	1.9%	0.11
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.2%	0.00
Two or more races	17	3.4%	10.1%	0.34
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	159	31.9%	17.4%	1.84

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.