TRANSITIONAL LIVING OF NORTH CENTRAL FL INC

What the center reported

3,375Consumers served1,399 carried over, 1,976 new
60Information and referral contacts
$2,638,987Total income
$73,790Part B
$416,522Part C
2,120Goals achievedof 3,297 set
59Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$73,790
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$416,522
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$891,233
State government funds	$345,389
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$912,053
Total income	$2,638,987

Eight years of reports

TRANSITIONAL LIVING OF NORTH CENTRAL FL INC by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	2,457	$1,949,104	$67,088	$302,152	0
2017	2,330	$2,083,179	$66,963	$305,303	1
2018	2,581	$2,119,318	$67,284	$348,663	1
2019	2,360	$1,931,099	$63,596	$362,964	2
2020	2,594	$2,656,189	$69,411	$364,012	5
2021	2,761	$2,221,076	$69,367	$365,480	10
2022	2,977	$2,410,038	$62,465	$377,929	85
2023	3,375	$2,638,987	$73,790	$416,522	59

Consumers served, by year

20162,457
20172,330
20182,581
20192,360
20202,594
20212,761
20222,977
20233,375

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$782	94th	99th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,245	88th	98th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	64.3%	67th	67th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	70.1%	54th	64th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.75	67th	71th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.16	85th	80th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	64th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 21.2 of 30.0 FTE.
Equity index	33.8	26th	23th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	12.0%	81th	82th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 18.6% of income; Part B varied by 4.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (60) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Transportation	1,465	1,465	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	196	196	100.0%
Vocational services	170	170	100.0%
Youth transition	159	159	100.0%
IL skills training	71	71	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	68	68	100.0%
Assistive technology	35	35	100.0%
Recreational services	24	24	100.0%
Peer counseling	20	20	100.0%
Communication services	14	14	100.0%
Other services	13	13	100.0%
Personal assistance	3	3	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,240	2,240	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 68 of 68 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 196 of 196 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 71 of 71 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 20 of 20 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	99	24	75
Communication	4	2	2
Mobility and transportation	2,490	1,881	609
Community-based living	56	4	52
Educational	44	5	39
Vocational	229	111	118
Self-care	45	29	16
Information access and technology	18	1	17
Personal resource management	29	2	27
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	263	59	204
Community and social participation	20	2	18

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	12
5 to 19	168
20 to 24	221
25 to 59	1,557
60 and older	1,373
Age unavailable	44

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	623
Mental or emotional	835
Physical	1,403
Hearing	186
Vision	100
Multiple disabilities	190
Other	38

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 76 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	1,501	45.5%	57.4%	0.79
Black or African American	1,499	45.4%	11.7%	3.87
American Indian or Alaska Native	12	0.4%	0.3%	1.24
Asian	28	0.8%	1.6%	0.52
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.1%	0.0%	1.38
Two or more races	83	2.5%	10.9%	0.23
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	174	5.3%	18.0%	0.29

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.