OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS

What the center reported

583Consumers served371 carried over, 212 new
1,246Information and referral contacts
$1,186,271Total income
$9,878Part B
$185,455Part C
851Goals achievedof 1,312 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$9,878
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$185,455
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$334,543
State government funds	$553,635
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$102,760
Total income	$1,186,271

Eight years of reports

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	228	$613,853	$7,065	$149,749	3
2017	211	$850,793	$7,065	$148,232	6
2018	318	$1,097,315	$102,546	$165,726	7
2019	365	$941,297	$61,726	$169,472	7
2020	421	$1,302,429	$0	$169,472	9
2021	485	$1,297,730	$0	$169,171	7
2022	547	$922,216	$171,171	$0	9
2023	583	$1,186,271	$9,878	$185,455	8

Consumers served, by year

2016228
2017211
2018318
2019365
2020421
2021485
2022547
2023583

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,035	68th	73th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,394	87th	86th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	64.9%	68th	65th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	65.6%	49th	41th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.37	63th	68th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	4.31	69th	68th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 4 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	98th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 12.0 of 12.0 FTE.
Equity index	30.7	31th	31th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	21.8%	43th	47th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 16.5% of income; Part B varied by 130.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,246) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	335	335	100.0%
IL skills training	328	328	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	253	253	100.0%
Preventive services	213	213	100.0%
Personal assistance	120	120	100.0%
Youth transition	104	104	100.0%
Peer counseling	91	91	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	87	87	100.0%
Children's services	73	73	100.0%
Vocational services	35	35	100.0%
Transportation	26	26	100.0%
Family services	20	20	100.0%
Counseling and related services	14	14	100.0%
Communication services	8	8	100.0%
Assistive technology	7	7	100.0%
Recreational services	2	2	100.0%
Mobility training	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,717	1,717	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 253 of 253 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 73 of 73 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 20 of 20 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 87 of 87 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 328 of 328 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	369	256	113
Communication	15	9	6
Mobility and transportation	64	36	28
Community-based living	90	46	44
Educational	97	57	40
Vocational	48	21	27
Self-care	167	124	43
Information access and technology	4	3	1
Personal resource management	325	228	97
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	11	8	3
Community and social participation	121	63	58
Other	1	0	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	9
5 to 19	115
20 to 24	44
25 to 59	272
60 and older	143
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	149
Mental or emotional	101
Physical	285
Hearing	5
Vision	20
Multiple disabilities	18
Other	5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	537	92.1%	61.7%	1.49
Black or African American	29	5.0%	16.5%	0.30
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	0.7%	0.5%	1.51
Asian	1	0.2%	3.4%	0.05
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	8	1.4%	6.4%	0.21
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	4	0.7%	11.6%	0.06

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.