Everybody Counts

What the center reported

119Consumers served26 carried over, 93 new
213Information and referral contacts
$627,104Total income
$170,556Part B
$159,820Part C
400Goals achievedof 451 set
24Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$170,556
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$159,820
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$153,374
State government funds	$143,354
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$0
Total income	$627,104

Eight years of reports

Everybody Counts by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	71	$274,457	$41,874	$123,036	13
2017	72	$373,844	$36,992	$122,424	18
2018	91	$292,049	$39,845	$137,775	8
2019	86	$334,426	$24,339	$141,602	10
2020	230	$433,122	$32,700	$141,602	26
2021	213	$518,850	$28,110	$118,515	124
2022	134	$364,658	$30,160	$144,241	35
2023	119	$627,104	$170,556	$159,820	24

Consumers served, by year

201671
201772
201891
201986
2020230
2021213
2022134
2023119

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,270	24th	13th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,568	84th	87th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	88.7%	93th	96th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	91.9%	88th	89th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	20.17	97th	97th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	15.02	87th	91th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	95.6%	36th	34th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	89th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.0 of 5.0 FTE.
Equity index	53.8	8th	10th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	27.8%	31th	22th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 52.7% of income; Part B varied by 90.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (213) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	79	79	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	71	67	94.4%
Communication services	51	51	100.0%
Preventive services	41	41	100.0%
IL skills training	37	35	94.6%
Recreational services	23	23	100.0%
Youth transition	19	15	78.9%
Housing and home modifications	17	16	94.1%
Transportation	17	17	100.0%
Family services	16	14	87.5%
Assistive technology	14	13	92.9%
Mobility training	13	10	76.9%
Personal assistance	13	13	100.0%
Vocational services	11	9	81.8%
Rehabilitation technology	7	7	100.0%
All services	429	410	95.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 10 of 13 requests filled (76.9%).
Youth transition: 15 of 19 requests filled (78.9%).
Vocational services: 9 of 11 requests filled (81.8%).
Family services: 14 of 16 requests filled (87.5%).
Assistive technology: 13 of 14 requests filled (92.9%).
Housing and home modifications: 16 of 17 requests filled (94.1%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	67	56	11
Communication	41	36	5
Mobility and transportation	27	21	6
Community-based living	64	59	5
Educational	17	14	3
Vocational	16	12	4
Self-care	43	39	4
Information access and technology	21	21	0
Personal resource management	53	49	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	27	24	3
Community and social participation	75	69	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	14
25 to 59	57
60 and older	43
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	10
Mental or emotional	12
Physical	38
Hearing	5
Vision	19
Multiple disabilities	35
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Indiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	36	30.3%	78.5%	0.39
Black or African American	46	38.7%	9.2%	4.22
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.8%	0.3%	3.01
Asian	2	1.7%	1.1%	1.57
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	5.5%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	34	28.6%	5.5%	5.21

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.