What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$185,130
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$84,870
State government funds$803,811
Local government funds$0
Private and other$731,152
Total income$1,804,963

Eight years of reports

Bronx Independent Living Services by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016283$1,099,408$24,840$140,3560
2017427$1,183,637$0$139,5265
2018342$1,324,205$0$156,3051
2019362$1,459,252$0$167,5651
2020403$1,812,108$0$167,5651
2021458$1,875,015$0$167,2670
2022657$1,860,678$0$169,2448
2023847$1,804,963$0$185,1308

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$2,13165th69thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$2,88871th65thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate40.0%37th33thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met0.0%3th2thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.9453th56thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C4.3269th70thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate92.5%31th24thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities67.0%37th40thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities61.0%21th21thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 19.0 of 31.0 FTE.
Equity index60.05th2thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility19.5%51th56thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th56thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 10.3% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,069) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Counseling and related services45944296.3%
Peer counseling25024196.4%
Housing and home modifications18818196.3%
IL skills training11610792.2%
Transportation11310088.5%
Vocational services917481.3%
Advocacy and legal services908088.9%
Assistive technology393487.2%
Youth transition353085.7%
Other services302273.3%
Personal assistance2929100.0%
Communication services241562.5%
Family services7685.7%
Mobility training100.0%
Recreational services11100.0%
All services1,4731,36292.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment35233
Communication61259
Mobility and transportation11310013
Community-based living267101164
Educational881771
Vocational13110120
Self-care37334
Information access and technology39345
Personal resource management1164967
Relocation from a nursing home or institution1848176
Community and social participation47641
Other443293149

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 55
5 to 1979
20 to 2446
25 to 59487
60 and older230
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive62
Mental or emotional100
Physical312
Hearing89
Vision6
Multiple disabilities278
Other0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 15 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White394.7%53.5%0.09
Black or African American30436.5%15.0%2.44
American Indian or Alaska Native161.9%0.6%3.21
Asian81.0%5.2%0.18
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander40.5%0.1%8.77
Two or more races70.8%7.8%0.11
Hispanic or Latino (any race)45454.6%17.9%3.06

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.