Center for Independent Living of South Central Pennsylvania

What the center reported

439Consumers served399 carried over, 40 new
568Information and referral contacts
$703,905Total income
$0Part B
$292,902Part C
1,094Goals achievedof 1,268 set
15Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$292,902
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$326,813
State government funds	$67,069
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$17,121
Total income	$703,905

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living of South Central Pennsylvania by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	221	$417,217	$0	$366,212	0
2017	238	$280,059	$0	$227,807	0
2018	263	$340,268	$0	$255,490	2
2019	353	$396,979	$0	$261,691	2
2020	363	$579,285	$0	$261,691	1
2021	405	$457,205	$0	$261,226	0
2022	425	$751,221	$0	$264,314	5
2023	439	$703,905	$0	$292,902	15

Consumers served, by year

2016221
2017238
2018263
2019353
2020363
2021405
2022425
2023439

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,603	79th	77th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$643	95th	97th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	86.3%	91th	93th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	44.4%	35th	32th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	3.42	77th	75th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	5.12	71th	76th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.4%	50th	52th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	56th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.0 of 6.0 FTE.
Equity index	10.1	88th	95th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	32.5%	24th	19th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 41.6% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (568) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	892	891	99.9%
Preventive services	397	397	100.0%
Peer counseling	230	229	99.6%
Mental restoration	200	199	99.5%
Advocacy and legal services	130	128	98.5%
Assistive technology	130	130	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	106	103	97.2%
Vocational services	100	99	99.0%
Other services	92	91	98.9%
Youth transition	60	60	100.0%
Communication services	30	30	100.0%
Transportation	30	29	96.7%
Children's services	10	10	100.0%
Counseling and related services	10	10	100.0%
Family services	10	10	100.0%
Physical restoration	10	9	90.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	10	9	90.0%
Recreational services	10	10	100.0%
Personal assistance	6	4	66.7%
All services	2,463	2,448	99.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Physical restoration: 9 of 10 requests filled (90.0%).
Prostheses and orthotics: 9 of 10 requests filled (90.0%).
Transportation: 29 of 30 requests filled (96.7%).
Housing and home modifications: 103 of 106 requests filled (97.2%).
Advocacy and legal services: 128 of 130 requests filled (98.5%).
Other services: 91 of 92 requests filled (98.9%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	132	113	19
Communication	22	11	11
Mobility and transportation	19	7	12
Community-based living	32	27	5
Educational	6	5	1
Vocational	25	12	13
Self-care	617	589	28
Information access and technology	111	88	23
Personal resource management	127	96	31
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	15	15	0
Community and social participation	142	121	21
Other	20	10	10

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	8
20 to 24	29
25 to 59	200
60 and older	201
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	80
Mental or emotional	79
Physical	191
Hearing	19
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	43
Other	16

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Pennsylvania residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 12 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	351	82.2%	72.1%	1.14
Black or African American	29	6.8%	12.1%	0.56
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.2%	0.00
Asian	6	1.4%	2.0%	0.69
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	10	2.3%	5.3%	0.45
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	31	7.3%	8.3%	0.88

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.