Blue Ridge Independent Living Center

What the center reported

266Consumers served142 carried over, 124 new
63Information and referral contacts
$850,460Total income
$26,000Part B
$332,607Part C
156Goals achievedof 353 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$26,000
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$332,607
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$45,874
State government funds	$383,806
Local government funds	$5,750
Private and other	$56,423
Total income	$850,460

Eight years of reports

Blue Ridge Independent Living Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	330	$710,158	$21,117	$254,513	8
2017	335	$728,794	$23,500	$254,093	1
2018	318	$741,809	$25,642	$286,359	0
2019	315	$786,842	$25,642	$294,845	0
2020	312	$771,735	$26,000	$294,848	1
2021	327	$954,389	$26,000	$294,324	0
2022	330	$842,560	$30,333	$300,644	0
2023	266	$850,460	$26,000	$332,607	2

Consumers served, by year

2016330
2017335
2018318
2019315
2020312
2021327
2022330
2023266

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,197	48th	39th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,452	49th	48th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	44.2%	43th	50th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	43.5%	33th	28th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.75	48th	44th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.60	37th	37th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	91.0%	75th	72th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.7 of 10.7 FTE.
Equity index	16.6	67th	75th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	9.5%	91th	90th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 42.2% of income; Part B varied by 9.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (63) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	113	113	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	39	39	100.0%
Communication services	21	21	100.0%
Peer counseling	18	18	100.0%
Other services	16	16	100.0%
Recreational services	10	10	100.0%
Assistive technology	6	6	100.0%
Preventive services	4	4	100.0%
IL skills training	3	3	100.0%
Youth transition	2	2	100.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
All services	234	234	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 113 of 113 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 21 of 21 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 39 of 39 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 18 of 18 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).
Other services: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	194	128	66
Mobility and transportation	3	1	2
Community-based living	114	18	96
Educational	2	0	2
Vocational	2	1	1
Self-care	6	0	6
Information access and technology	9	5	4
Personal resource management	2	0	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	10	2	8
Community and social participation	10	1	9
Other	1	0	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	4
25 to 59	102
60 and older	155
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	20
Mental or emotional	14
Physical	164
Hearing	1
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	64
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Virginia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	151	56.8%	63.1%	0.90
Black or African American	98	36.8%	20.3%	1.82
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.4%	0.4%	1.05
Asian	1	0.4%	3.8%	0.10
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	9	3.4%	5.9%	0.57
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	6	2.3%	6.5%	0.35

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.