Rolling Start, Inc.

What the center reported

2,311Consumers served1,063 carried over, 1,248 new
2,922Information and referral contacts
$2,601,547Total income
$35,875Part B
$158,310Part C
1,806Goals achievedof 2,705 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$35,875
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$158,310
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$65,132
State government funds	$1,257,346
Local government funds	$990,804
Private and other	$94,079
Total income	$2,601,547

Eight years of reports

Rolling Start, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	886	$689,445	$0	$123,068	1
2017	904	$703,661	$11,378	$124,385	0
2018	1,130	$727,568	$15,131	$140,075	0
2019	1,238	$1,005,920	$57,642	$144,282	2
2020	1,069	$936,932	$29,071	$144,282	8
2021	1,575	$1,256,830	$54,745	$144,027	4
2022	1,917	$1,535,925	$0	$145,728	6
2023	2,311	$2,601,547	$35,875	$158,310	2

Consumers served, by year

2016886
2017904
20181,130
20191,238
20201,069
20211,575
20221,917
20232,311

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,126	88th	98th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,441	86th	97th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	66.8%	71th	75th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	96.6%	95th	99th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.09	23th	19th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.26	49th	41th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	64.4%	7th	8th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	73.0%	53th	65th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	61.0%	21th	38th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 17.0 of 28.0 FTE.
Equity index	38.4	18th	12th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	51.1%	9th	9th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	5th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 7.5% of income; Part B varied by 83.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,922) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	493	283	57.4%
Assistive technology	376	168	44.7%
Advocacy and legal services	364	241	66.2%
Family services	333	271	81.4%
Other services	116	58	50.0%
Preventive services	104	88	84.6%
Transportation	100	79	79.0%
Youth transition	86	46	53.5%
Vocational services	85	52	61.2%
IL skills training	74	52	70.3%
Personal assistance	71	43	60.6%
Counseling and related services	68	65	95.6%
Recreational services	27	23	85.2%
Peer counseling	26	23	88.5%
Communication services	16	14	87.5%
Children's services	6	2	33.3%
Mental restoration	3	3	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Physical restoration	2	1	50.0%
Therapeutic treatment	2	2	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,356	1,518	64.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 168 of 376 requests filled (44.7%).
Other services: 58 of 116 requests filled (50.0%).
Youth transition: 46 of 86 requests filled (53.5%).
Housing and home modifications: 283 of 493 requests filled (57.4%).
Personal assistance: 43 of 71 requests filled (60.6%).
Vocational services: 52 of 85 requests filled (61.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	690	539	106
Communication	24	12	12
Mobility and transportation	110	75	28
Community-based living	484	258	201
Educational	13	7	5
Vocational	93	60	31
Self-care	279	189	82
Information access and technology	291	127	111
Personal resource management	480	377	87
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	2	4
Community and social participation	51	28	21
Other	184	132	49

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	31
5 to 19	90
20 to 24	84
25 to 59	1,084
60 and older	1,022
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	231
Mental or emotional	231
Physical	1,060
Hearing	25
Vision	225
Multiple disabilities	508
Other	31

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 19 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	538	23.6%	42.3%	0.56
Black or African American	665	29.2%	6.4%	4.59
American Indian or Alaska Native	15	0.7%	1.2%	0.55
Asian	27	1.2%	10.2%	0.12
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	9	0.4%	0.4%	1.11
Two or more races	41	1.8%	11.9%	0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	983	43.2%	27.6%	1.56

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

Race table does not match total served. The race and ethnicity rows do not add up to consumers served.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.