Southern Illinois Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

713Consumers served395 carried over, 318 new
1,825Information and referral contacts
$1,929,748Total income
$369,479Part B
$185,149Part C
283Goals achievedof 559 set
5Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$369,479
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$185,149
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$174,783
Other federal funds	$349,217
State government funds	$564,485
Local government funds	$8,500
Private and other	$278,134
Total income	$1,929,748

Eight years of reports

Southern Illinois Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	391	$932,488	$49,663	$149,482	2
2017	207	$874,570	$89,902	$147,989	3
2018	338	$2,017,654	$29,352	$165,454	6
2019	348	$1,071,030	$46,248	$169,194	6
2020	318	$1,355,050	$93,597	$169,194	1
2021	479	$1,295,180	$229,976	$168,893	2
2022	740	$1,849,472	$408,113	$170,889	5
2023	713	$1,929,748	$369,479	$185,149	5

Consumers served, by year

2016391
2017207
2018338
2019348
2020318
2021479
2022740
2023713

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,707	54th	52th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$6,819	43th	35th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	50.6%	49th	48th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.8%	62th	54th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.70	46th	49th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.70	62th	62th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	78th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	68th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 18.0 of 22.0 FTE.
Equity index	17.8	63th	60th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	30.4%	27th	29th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 37.8% of income; Part B varied by 86.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,825) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	162	162	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	97	97	100.0%
IL skills training	74	74	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	70	70	100.0%
Children's services	66	66	100.0%
Peer counseling	50	50	100.0%
Counseling and related services	40	40	100.0%
Communication services	32	32	100.0%
Transportation	23	23	100.0%
Personal assistance	22	22	100.0%
Other services	21	21	100.0%
Preventive services	20	20	100.0%
Recreational services	9	9	100.0%
Family services	8	8	100.0%
Vocational services	8	8	100.0%
Mental restoration	5	5	100.0%
Youth transition	5	5	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	4	4	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	2	2	100.0%
All services	720	720	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 97 of 97 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 162 of 162 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 66 of 66 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 32 of 32 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 40 of 40 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 70 of 70 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	71	9	62
Communication	18	3	15
Mobility and transportation	11	2	9
Community-based living	140	91	49
Educational	19	4	15
Vocational	20	4	16
Information access and technology	219	153	66
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	5	4
Community and social participation	56	12	44

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	163
20 to 24	46
25 to 59	173
60 and older	331
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	102
Mental or emotional	213
Physical	88
Hearing	1
Vision	279
Multiple disabilities	13
Other	17

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	527	73.9%	61.7%	1.20
Black or African American	157	22.0%	16.5%	1.34
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.5%	0.00
Asian	2	0.3%	3.4%	0.08
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	14	2.0%	6.4%	0.31
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	13	1.8%	11.6%	0.16

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.