Independent Living Center of North Central Ohio, Inc.

What the center reported

626Consumers served288 carried over, 338 new
528Information and referral contacts
$636,381Total income
$73,535Part B
$305,874Part C
1,264Goals achievedof 1,730 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$73,535
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$305,874
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$121,984
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$134,988
Total income	$636,381

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Center of North Central Ohio, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	381	$273,601	$0	$239,107	0
2017	369	$269,724	$0	$237,491	0
2018	770	$284,570	$0	$266,754	2
2019	574	$318,859	$0	$273,813	1
2020	716	$306,574	$0	$273,813	2
2021	448	$320,458	$0	$273,326	1
2022	625	$466,855	$0	$276,557	3
2023	626	$636,381	$73,535	$305,874	1

Consumers served, by year

2016381
2017369
2018770
2019574
2020716
2021448
2022625
2023626

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,017	90th	92th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$503	96th	98th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	73.1%	79th	83th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	89.5%	83th	82th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.16	26th	23th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.33	27th	25th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	60.0%	20th	21th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities	69.0%	35th	29th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 13.0 FTE.
Equity index	13.3	77th	83th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	33.4%	22th	14th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 59.6% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (528) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	448	448	100.0%
IL skills training	411	411	100.0%
Physical restoration	347	347	100.0%
Preventive services	157	157	100.0%
Other services	151	151	100.0%
Recreational services	127	127	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	61	61	100.0%
Family services	55	55	100.0%
Mental restoration	50	50	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	46	46	100.0%
Assistive technology	31	31	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	9	9	100.0%
Mobility training	9	9	100.0%
Peer counseling	7	7	100.0%
Youth transition	7	7	100.0%
Children's services	6	6	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	6	100.0%
Vocational services	5	5	100.0%
Communication services	3	3	100.0%
Transportation	3	3	100.0%
All services	1,939	1,939	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 61 of 61 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 55 of 55 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 411 of 411 requests filled (100.0%).
Mental restoration: 50 of 50 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 448 of 448 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	217	117	100
Communication	11	8	3
Mobility and transportation	97	58	39
Community-based living	48	36	12
Educational	93	93	0
Vocational	5	5	0
Self-care	393	314	79
Information access and technology	437	435	2
Personal resource management	350	136	214
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	1	1	0
Community and social participation	78	61	17

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	58
5 to 19	152
20 to 24	37
25 to 59	205
60 and older	174
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	84
Mental or emotional	128
Physical	324
Hearing	3
Vision	6
Multiple disabilities	78
Other	3

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Ohio residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	424	68.1%	77.0%	0.88
Black or African American	158	25.4%	13.0%	1.96
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.3%	0.2%	1.55
Asian	1	0.2%	1.1%	0.15
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	5	0.8%	0.0%	23.75
Two or more races	28	4.5%	5.1%	0.89
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	5	0.8%	3.7%	0.22

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.