Center for Independent Living for Western Wisconsin

What the center reported

642Consumers served210 carried over, 432 new
2,862Information and referral contacts
$7,488,243Total income
$25,726Part B
$526,467Part C
433Goals achievedof 576 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$25,726
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$526,467
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$5,381,981
State government funds	$714,222
Local government funds	$35,000
Private and other	$804,847
Total income	$7,488,243

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living for Western Wisconsin by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	502	$4,597,520	$27,833	$408,336	6
2017	643	$5,434,235	$38,218	$405,873	5
2018	690	$5,835,343	$28,443	$456,427	61
2019	610	$6,301,688	$27,466	$468,082	65
2020	550	$6,861,925	$48,588	$468,082	66
2021	608	$6,938,430	$15,135	$467,250	27
2022	544	$6,824,118	$74,882	$473,604	0
2023	642	$7,488,243	$25,726	$526,467	0

Consumers served, by year

2016502
2017643
2018690
2019610
2020550
2021608
2022544
2023642

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$11,664	10th	31th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$17,294	20th	42th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	75.2%	83th	88th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	92.5%	88th	92th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	9th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	9th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	58.0%	16th	18th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 12 members.
Staff with disabilities	60.0%	19th	35th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 18.0 of 30.0 FTE.
Equity index	13.4	76th	71th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	14.1%	72th	73th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 7.4% of income; Part B varied by 48.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,862) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Vocational services	205	205	100.0%
Assistive technology	201	201	100.0%
IL skills training	135	135	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	96	96	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	28	28	100.0%
Transportation	22	22	100.0%
Peer counseling	9	9	100.0%
Youth transition	5	5	100.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
All services	705	705	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 28 of 28 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 201 of 201 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 96 of 96 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 135 of 135 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 22 of 22 requests filled (100.0%).
Vocational services: 205 of 205 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	24	14	10
Communication	11	9	2
Mobility and transportation	26	23	3
Community-based living	94	74	20
Educational	55	42	13
Vocational	191	159	32
Self-care	10	1	9
Information access and technology	135	101	34
Personal resource management	12	6	6
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	12	0	12
Community and social participation	6	4	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	8
5 to 19	143
20 to 24	83
25 to 59	248
60 and older	160
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	158
Mental or emotional	155
Physical	194
Hearing	67
Vision	49
Multiple disabilities	1
Other	18

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Wisconsin residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	577	90.3%	80.0%	1.13
Black or African American	14	2.2%	6.9%	0.32
American Indian or Alaska Native	23	3.6%	1.0%	3.52
Asian	13	2.0%	1.5%	1.37
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	5.1%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	12	1.9%	5.4%	0.35

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.