Center for Independent Living in Central Florida, Inc.

What the center reported

903Consumers served402 carried over, 501 new
3,926Information and referral contacts
$1,891,774Total income
$87,997Part B
$354,034Part C
852Goals achievedof 1,236 set
10Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$87,997
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$354,034
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$137,482
State government funds	$528,612
Local government funds	$474,825
Private and other	$308,824
Total income	$1,891,774

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living in Central Florida, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,310	$1,160,732	$78,114	$256,819	1
2017	1,477	$1,766,598	$78,098	$259,499	16
2018	1,138	$1,574,373	$79,288	$296,355	10
2019	786	$1,350,560	$74,240	$308,512	5
2020	778	$1,471,323	$82,515	$309,403	9
2021	758	$1,561,667	$80,929	$310,650	0
2022	829	$1,621,646	$70,694	$321,231	4
2023	903	$1,891,774	$87,997	$354,034	10

Consumers served, by year

20161,310
20171,477
20181,138
2019786
2020778
2021758
2022829
2023903

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,095	67th	72th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,220	76th	73th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	68.9%	75th	68th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	—	—	—	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.11	57th	59th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.82	63th	64th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	73.0%	53th	54th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	73.0%	42th	52th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 13.9 of 19.0 FTE.
Equity index	37.8	19th	14th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.8%	74th	77th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 23.4% of income; Part B varied by 6.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,926) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	600	600	100.0%
Youth transition	320	320	100.0%
IL skills training	285	285	100.0%
Peer counseling	160	160	100.0%
Assistive technology	139	139	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	128	128	100.0%
Vocational services	96	96	100.0%
Other services	65	65	100.0%
Family services	44	44	100.0%
Children's services	34	34	100.0%
Transportation	29	29	100.0%
Counseling and related services	26	26	100.0%
Communication services	25	25	100.0%
Mental restoration	10	10	100.0%
Recreational services	4	4	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Physical restoration	2	2	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	2	2	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,972	1,972	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 600 of 600 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 139 of 139 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 34 of 34 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 26 of 26 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 44 of 44 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	6	3	0
Communication	9	7	1
Mobility and transportation	6	3	3
Community-based living	958	648	191
Educational	27	20	7
Vocational	31	11	9
Information access and technology	6	5	1
Personal resource management	115	114	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	15	10	4
Community and social participation	59	30	24
Other	4	1	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	17
5 to 19	190
20 to 24	60
25 to 59	345
60 and older	291
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	245
Mental or emotional	57
Physical	278
Hearing	247
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	65
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 36 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	260	30.0%	57.4%	0.52
Black or African American	249	28.7%	11.7%	2.45
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.7%	0.3%	2.35
Asian	8	0.9%	1.6%	0.57
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.2%	0.0%	5.24
Two or more races	10	1.2%	10.9%	0.11
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	332	38.3%	18.0%	2.13

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.