Independent Living Center of Southern California

What the center reported

981Consumers served685 carried over, 296 new
3,672Information and referral contacts
$2,090,894Total income
$0Part B
$174,708Part C
7,601Goals achievedof 7,906 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$174,708
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$268,989
State government funds	$1,502,909
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$144,288
Total income	$2,090,894

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Center of Southern California by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	4,337	$2,546,458	$0	$137,221	4
2017	3,100	$1,073,023	$0	$137,269	4
2018	2,434	$1,373,434	$0	$154,584	3
2019	5,955	$1,148,157	$0	$159,227	16
2020	3,183	$1,445,223	$0	$159,227	0
2021	2,042	$1,254,212	$0	$158,944	3
2022	2,144	$888,576	$0	$160,823	3
2023	981	$2,090,894	$0	$174,708	2

Consumers served, by year

20164,337
20173,100
20182,434
20195,955
20203,183
20212,042
20222,144
2023981

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,131	65th	69th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$275	99th	99th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	96.1%	97th	93th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	98.0%	97th	92th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.20	28th	32th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.14	46th	40th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	62.0%	24th	30th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 13 members.
Staff with disabilities	35.0%	3th	2th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 26.0 FTE.
Equity index	35.8	22th	18th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	35.5%	19th	19th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 8.4% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,672) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	4,164	4,164	100.0%
Assistive technology	3,868	3,868	100.0%
Personal assistance	2,673	2,673	100.0%
Recreational services	1,917	1,917	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	1,660	1,660	100.0%
IL skills training	1,066	1,066	100.0%
Transportation	300	300	100.0%
Vocational services	201	201	100.0%
Peer counseling	91	91	100.0%
Youth transition	65	65	100.0%
All services	16,005	16,005	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 4,164 of 4,164 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 3,868 of 3,868 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 1,660 of 1,660 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 1,066 of 1,066 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 91 of 91 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 2,673 of 2,673 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	1,991	1,949	41
Communication	166	155	11
Mobility and transportation	150	143	7
Community-based living	333	333	0
Educational	150	139	11
Vocational	3,934	3,907	27
Self-care	274	170	103
Information access and technology	194	187	7
Personal resource management	228	146	82
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	2	2	0
Community and social participation	484	470	14

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	0
20 to 24	35
25 to 59	20
60 and older	846
Age unavailable	80

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	13
Mental or emotional	189
Physical	225
Hearing	135
Vision	259
Multiple disabilities	160
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	221	22.5%	42.3%	0.53
Black or African American	187	19.1%	6.4%	3.00
American Indian or Alaska Native	81	8.3%	1.2%	6.86
Asian	70	7.1%	10.2%	0.70
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	86	8.8%	0.4%	24.64
Two or more races	192	19.6%	11.9%	1.64
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	144	14.7%	27.6%	0.53

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.