Glens Falls Independent Living Center

What the center reported

999Consumers served123 carried over, 876 new
5,149Information and referral contacts
$3,224,568Total income
$0Part B
$210,475Part C
551Goals achievedof 1,889 set
12Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$210,475
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$998,113
State government funds	$1,841,790
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$174,190
Total income	$3,224,568

Eight years of reports

Glens Falls Independent Living Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,056	$2,084,844	$0	$161,080	26
2017	875	$2,269,366	$0	$159,570	1
2018	940	$2,016,922	$0	$158,627	0
2019	713	$2,766,521	$0	$190,505	5
2020	675	$2,583,152	$190,505	$0	0
2021	620	$3,005,350	$0	$190,166	3
2022	773	$2,915,812	$0	$192,414	6
2023	999	$3,224,568	$0	$210,475	12

Consumers served, by year

20161,056
2017875
2018940
2019713
2020675
2021620
2022773
2023999

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,228	47th	81th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,852	46th	74th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	29.2%	25th	26th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	86.9%	78th	85th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.20	59th	64th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	5.70	74th	63th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	57.0%	14th	16th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 14 members.
Staff with disabilities	75.0%	45th	73th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 27.0 of 36.0 FTE.
Equity index	38.2	19th	14th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.0%	66th	68th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 6.5% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,149) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	3,513	3,513	100.0%
Assistive technology	2,480	2,480	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	1,207	1,207	100.0%
Peer counseling	185	185	100.0%
Personal assistance	157	157	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	87	87	100.0%
IL skills training	43	43	100.0%
Communication services	29	29	100.0%
Preventive services	25	25	100.0%
Youth transition	16	16	100.0%
Transportation	10	10	100.0%
Vocational services	6	6	100.0%
Children's services	2	2	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	7,764	7,764	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 1,207 of 1,207 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 2,480 of 2,480 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 29 of 29 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 87 of 87 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 43 of 43 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 185 of 185 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	661	475	186
Communication	1	1	0
Community-based living	236	42	194
Educational	1	0	1
Vocational	3	2	1
Self-care	534	14	520
Information access and technology	125	3	122
Personal resource management	302	1	301
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	25	12	13
Community and social participation	1	1	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	7
5 to 19	24
20 to 24	58
25 to 59	435
60 and older	470
Age unavailable	5

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	64
Mental or emotional	53
Physical	278
Hearing	1
Vision	1
Multiple disabilities	576
Other	26

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 374 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	573	91.7%	53.5%	1.71
Black or African American	17	2.7%	15.0%	0.18
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	0.6%	0.6%	1.07
Asian	4	0.6%	5.2%	0.12
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	27	4.3%	7.8%	0.55
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	0	0.0%	17.9%	0.00

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.