Linking Employment, Abilities and Potential

What the center reported

853Consumers served464 carried over, 389 new
602Information and referral contacts
$1,960,868Total income
$274,979Part B
$193,575Part C
540Goals achievedof 744 set
55Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$274,979
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$193,575
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$265,395
State government funds	$593,572
Local government funds	$163,719
Private and other	$469,628
Total income	$1,960,868

Eight years of reports

Linking Employment, Abilities and Potential by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,013	$2,348,839	$70,458	$151,320	41
2017	1,023	$2,086,913	$68,803	$150,297	47
2018	730	$2,070,770	$70,382	$168,816	38
2019	755	$1,970,023	$134,496	$173,283	29
2020	445	$1,751,999	$165,742	$173,331	28
2021	684	$1,766,896	$211,717	$172,976	51
2022	841	$1,527,618	$176,717	$175,021	60
2023	853	$1,960,868	$274,979	$193,575	55

Consumers served, by year

20161,013
20171,023
2018730
2019755
2020445
2021684
2022841
2023853

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,299	61th	64th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,631	66th	62th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	72.6%	79th	74th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	67.1%	51th	43th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	6.45	86th	90th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	28.41	94th	91th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	55.0%	6th	3th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	55.0%	10th	12th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 20.0 FTE.
Equity index	32.0	29th	28th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	12.1%	81th	83th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 23.9% of income; Part B varied by 48.1% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (602) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Recreational services	306	306	100.0%
Vocational services	112	112	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	90	90	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	53	53	100.0%
Preventive services	30	30	100.0%
Youth transition	23	23	100.0%
IL skills training	18	18	100.0%
Counseling and related services	14	14	100.0%
Peer counseling	5	5	100.0%
All services	651	651	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 53 of 53 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 90 of 90 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 18 of 18 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 30 of 30 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 306 of 306 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	65	56	9
Communication	1	1	0
Mobility and transportation	9	7	2
Community-based living	125	62	63
Educational	1	1	0
Vocational	105	88	17
Self-care	20	17	3
Information access and technology	1	1	0
Personal resource management	45	41	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	63	55	8
Community and social participation	309	211	98

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	62
20 to 24	73
25 to 59	457
60 and older	261
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	533
Mental or emotional	56
Physical	227
Hearing	13
Vision	7
Multiple disabilities	3
Other	14

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Ohio residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 5 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	416	49.1%	77.0%	0.64
Black or African American	377	44.5%	13.0%	3.43
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	0.5%	0.2%	2.28
Asian	8	0.9%	1.1%	0.90
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	10	1.2%	5.1%	0.23
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	33	3.9%	3.7%	1.06

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.