Center for Independent Living of North Central PA

What the center reported

637Consumers served445 carried over, 192 new
5,175Information and referral contacts
$1,798,096Total income
$0Part B
$319,644Part C
84Goals achievedof 576 set
30Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$319,644
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$67,674
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$6,067
Private and other	$1,404,712
Total income	$1,798,096

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living of North Central PA by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	303	$1,238,780	$0	$250,413	0
2017	392	$1,572,577	$0	$248,605	15
2018	491	$1,398,167	$0	$278,816	18
2019	1,258	$1,280,280	$0	$285,583	39
2020	575	$1,119,914	$0	$285,583	69
2021	639	$2,163,256	$0	$285,076	73
2022	644	$1,836,583	$0	$288,446	56
2023	637	$1,798,096	$0	$319,644	30

Consumers served, by year

2016303
2017392
2018491
20191,258
2020575
2021639
2022644
2023637

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,823	52th	48th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$21,406	15th	11th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	14.6%	10th	10th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	32.6%	24th	23th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	4.71	81th	82th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	9.39	80th	79th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	58th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	81.0%	56th	65th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 15.0 of 18.5 FTE.
Equity index	12.0	81th	78th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	21.6%	45th	50th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 17.8% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,175) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Youth transition	179	179	100.0%
IL skills training	133	133	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	98	98	100.0%
Other services	33	33	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	25	25	100.0%
Vocational services	25	25	100.0%
Assistive technology	20	20	100.0%
Peer counseling	9	9	100.0%
Recreational services	4	4	100.0%
Personal assistance	2	2	100.0%
Communication services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
All services	530	530	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 20 of 20 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 98 of 98 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 133 of 133 requests filled (100.0%).
Youth transition: 179 of 179 requests filled (100.0%).
Vocational services: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	29	0	26
Communication	4	2	2
Mobility and transportation	2	0	1
Community-based living	135	44	90
Vocational	25	0	25
Self-care	3	0	3
Information access and technology	3	1	2
Personal resource management	186	6	166
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	162	30	105
Community and social participation	9	1	8
Other	18	0	17

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	22
25 to 59	301
60 and older	308
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	47
Mental or emotional	212
Physical	269
Hearing	2
Vision	7
Multiple disabilities	44
Other	56

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Pennsylvania residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 97 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	452	83.7%	72.1%	1.16
Black or African American	59	10.9%	12.1%	0.90
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.6%	0.2%	2.59
Asian	1	0.2%	2.0%	0.09
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	8	1.5%	5.3%	0.28
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	17	3.1%	8.3%	0.38

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.