Regional Access & Mobilization Project

What the center reported

833Consumers served371 carried over, 462 new
2,084Information and referral contacts
$3,074,602Total income
$23,470Part B
$187,324Part C
750Goals achievedof 1,112 set
20Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$23,470
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$187,324
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$439,345
State government funds	$828,121
Local government funds	$783,940
Private and other	$812,402
Total income	$3,074,602

Eight years of reports

Regional Access & Mobilization Project by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	766	$1,715,862	$43,734	$150,586	7
2017	715	$1,755,909	$35,787	$149,726	13
2018	674	$2,523,985	$13,814	$167,396	11
2019	597	$2,505,894	$20,233	$171,180	58
2020	604	$2,355,962	$26,302	$171,180	16
2021	582	$2,583,370	$27,507	$170,876	12
2022	731	$3,232,232	$15,555	$172,896	16
2023	833	$3,074,602	$23,470	$187,324	20

Consumers served, by year

2016766
2017715
2018674
2019597
2020604
2021582
2022731
2023833

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,691	42th	75th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,099	62th	87th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	67.4%	71th	76th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	46.5%	36th	41th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	2.40	71th	75th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	10.68	82th	77th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	54.0%	5th	10th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 13 members.
Staff with disabilities	75.0%	45th	73th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 27.0 of 36.0 FTE.
Equity index	6.8	95th	92th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	20.5%	49th	54th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 6.9% of income; Part B varied by 36.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,084) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Vocational services	229	229	100.0%
Youth transition	173	173	100.0%
IL skills training	163	163	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	125	125	100.0%
Preventive services	119	119	100.0%
Children's services	101	101	100.0%
Personal assistance	85	85	100.0%
Transportation	78	78	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	77	77	100.0%
Peer counseling	42	42	100.0%
Other services	36	36	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	28	28	100.0%
Assistive technology	17	17	100.0%
Communication services	6	6	100.0%
Recreational services	6	6	100.0%
Counseling and related services	5	5	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,291	1,291	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 77 of 77 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 17 of 17 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 101 of 101 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 125 of 125 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 163 of 163 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 42 of 42 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	94	71	23
Communication	18	12	6
Mobility and transportation	44	22	22
Community-based living	153	75	78
Educational	161	129	32
Vocational	283	193	90
Self-care	139	97	42
Information access and technology	10	7	3
Personal resource management	120	91	29
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	48	20	28
Community and social participation	21	14	7
Other	21	19	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	6
5 to 19	278
20 to 24	98
25 to 59	282
60 and older	169
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	331
Mental or emotional	180
Physical	278
Hearing	22
Vision	17
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 14 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	509	62.1%	61.7%	1.01
Black or African American	176	21.5%	16.5%	1.31
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.6%	0.5%	1.34
Asian	9	1.1%	3.4%	0.32
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	3.74
Two or more races	61	7.4%	6.4%	1.16
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	58	7.1%	11.6%	0.61

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.