Disability Options Network

What the center reported

98Consumers served35 carried over, 63 new
44Information and referral contacts
$448,792Total income
$236,102Part B
$212,690Part C
333Goals achievedof 516 set
36Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
7Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$236,102
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$212,690
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$0
Total income	$448,792

Eight years of reports

Disability Options Network by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	—	—	—	—	—
2017	94	$279,465	$0	$165,421	2
2018	168	$195,524	$0	$185,524	2
2019	158	$190,887	$0	$190,027	2
2020	158	$246,501	$0	$190,027	1
2021	175	$245,021	$0	$189,689	0
2022	123	$5,423,854	$0	$148,340	1
2023	98	$448,792	$236,102	$212,690	36

Consumers served, by year

2016—
201794
2018168
2019158
2020158
2021175
2022123
202398

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,580	30th	13th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,348	87th	74th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	64.5%	68th	64th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	89.0%	82th	80th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	36.73	99th	97th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	16.93	88th	90th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.2%	43th	43th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	24th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 8.0 of 8.0 FTE.
Equity index	13.5	75th	77th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	179.8%	0th	1th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 100.0% of income; Part B varied by 244.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (44) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	706	691	97.9%
Advocacy and legal services	35	35	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	35	35	100.0%
Personal assistance	32	32	100.0%
Assistive technology	28	27	96.4%
Youth transition	14	14	100.0%
Other services	14	14	100.0%
Recreational services	11	11	100.0%
IL skills training	9	9	100.0%
Preventive services	6	6	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Transportation	1	1	100.0%
Vocational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	894	878	98.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 27 of 28 requests filled (96.4%).
Peer counseling: 691 of 706 requests filled (97.9%).
Advocacy and legal services: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 32 of 32 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	57	37	20
Communication	38	36	2
Mobility and transportation	55	38	17
Community-based living	129	51	78
Educational	39	36	3
Vocational	19	2	17
Self-care	57	43	14
Information access and technology	44	36	8
Personal resource management	12	2	10
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	44	36	8
Community and social participation	22	16	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	2
25 to 59	36
60 and older	58
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	9
Mental or emotional	1
Physical	78
Hearing	4
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	3

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Pennsylvania residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	71	74.7%	72.1%	1.04
Black or African American	20	21.1%	12.1%	1.73
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	2.1%	0.2%	9.83
Asian	0	0.0%	2.0%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	1	1.1%	5.3%	0.20
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	1	1.1%	8.3%	0.13

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.