ODI/Independent Living Resource Center of NE Florida

What the center reported

786Consumers served315 carried over, 471 new
3,720Information and referral contacts
$2,096,242Total income
$64,277Part B
$333,512Part C
401Goals achievedof 768 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$64,277
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$333,512
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$695,680
State government funds	$153,324
Local government funds	$69,260
Private and other	$780,189
Total income	$2,096,242

Eight years of reports

ODI/Independent Living Resource Center of NE Florida by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	878	$1,720,164	$58,564	$241,932	1
2017	1,337	$2,194,532	$58,626	$244,457	0
2018	1,662	$2,257,644	$58,818	$279,176	1
2019	1,148	$2,799,640	$55,552	$290,628	1
2020	593	$2,367,510	$60,553	$291,468	0
2021	859	$2,427,610	$60,432	$292,643	1
2022	787	$1,989,086	$50,641	$302,611	1
2023	786	$2,096,242	$64,277	$333,512	1

Consumers served, by year

2016878
20171,337
20181,662
20191,148
2020593
2021859
2022787
2023786

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,667	54th	55th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,228	50th	44th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	52.2%	52th	51th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	83.9%	72th	64th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.13	24th	26th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.30	26th	29th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	11th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	46th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 14.5 of 20.5 FTE.
Equity index	28.3	36th	36th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.4%	76th	80th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 19.0% of income; Part B varied by 6.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,720) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	798	798	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	325	325	100.0%
Assistive technology	265	265	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	69	69	100.0%
Vocational services	45	45	100.0%
Peer counseling	44	44	100.0%
Youth transition	42	42	100.0%
Counseling and related services	36	36	100.0%
IL skills training	35	35	100.0%
Transportation	25	25	100.0%
Other services	20	20	100.0%
Mobility training	13	13	100.0%
Communication services	12	12	100.0%
Children's services	4	4	100.0%
Preventive services	2	2	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,736	1,736	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 265 of 265 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 36 of 36 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 325 of 325 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	45	10	29
Communication	16	10	6
Mobility and transportation	227	156	69
Community-based living	116	57	51
Educational	19	5	12
Vocational	59	17	29
Self-care	171	97	71
Information access and technology	9	5	4
Personal resource management	92	39	44
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	1	1	0
Community and social participation	9	1	7
Other	4	3	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	16
5 to 19	79
20 to 24	29
25 to 59	323
60 and older	339
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	54
Mental or emotional	48
Physical	321
Hearing	106
Vision	25
Multiple disabilities	226
Other	6

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 39 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	362	48.5%	57.4%	0.84
Black or African American	298	39.9%	11.7%	3.40
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.3%	0.3%	0.91
Asian	11	1.5%	1.6%	0.91
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	3.04
Two or more races	17	2.3%	10.9%	0.21
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	56	7.5%	18.0%	0.42

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.