Illinois Iowa Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

395Consumers served280 carried over, 115 new
16,446Information and referral contacts
$853,920Total income
$291,994Part B
$249,353Part C
434Goals achievedof 581 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$291,994
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$249,353
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$219,994
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$92,579
Total income	$853,920

Eight years of reports

Illinois Iowa Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	151	$140,298	$16,897	$101,296	1
2017	296	$526,185	$7,065	$199,307	3
2018	356	$648,699	$16,021	$222,829	12
2019	438	$793,420	$16,021	$227,866	3
2020	438	$793,420	$16,021	$227,866	3
2021	349	$1,023,956	$180,009	$227,460	12
2022	386	$763,090	$150,703	$230,148	10
2023	395	$853,920	$291,994	$249,353	0

Consumers served, by year

2016151
2017296
2018356
2019438
2020438
2021349
2022386
2023395

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,162	64th	61th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,968	80th	78th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	74.7%	82th	86th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	72.7%	57th	59th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	10th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	10th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	82.0%	72th	72th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 9 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	86.0%	68th	63th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	17.3	65th	73th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	35.9%	18th	12th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 63.4% of income; Part B varied by 116.0% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (16,446) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	142	142	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	103	103	100.0%
IL skills training	92	92	100.0%
Communication services	85	85	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	70	70	100.0%
Personal assistance	54	54	100.0%
Vocational services	52	52	100.0%
Assistive technology	49	49	100.0%
Youth transition	44	44	100.0%
Transportation	24	24	100.0%
Recreational services	16	16	100.0%
Other services	16	16	100.0%
Counseling and related services	15	15	100.0%
Children's services	3	3	100.0%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	772	772	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 103 of 103 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 49 of 49 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 85 of 85 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 70 of 70 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 92 of 92 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	58	42	16
Communication	28	17	11
Mobility and transportation	26	16	10
Community-based living	40	32	8
Educational	47	44	3
Vocational	55	42	13
Self-care	36	24	12
Information access and technology	67	38	29
Personal resource management	111	86	25
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	2	0	2
Community and social participation	57	48	9
Other	54	45	9

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	111
20 to 24	15
25 to 59	113
60 and older	152
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	74
Mental or emotional	83
Physical	91
Hearing	34
Vision	71
Multiple disabilities	42
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	227	57.6%	61.7%	0.93
Black or African American	130	33.0%	16.5%	2.00
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	1.0%	0.5%	2.23
Asian	0	0.0%	3.4%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.3%	0.0%	7.78
Two or more races	2	0.5%	6.4%	0.08
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	30	7.6%	11.6%	0.66

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.