Disability Network Eastern Michigan

What the center reported

1,042Consumers served319 carried over, 723 new
433Information and referral contacts
$3,835,416Total income
$32,241Part B
$159,378Part C
677Goals achievedof 1,036 set
35Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$32,241
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$159,378
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,471,560
State government funds	$1,811,931
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$360,306
Total income	$3,835,416

Eight years of reports

Disability Network Eastern Michigan by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	977	$1,938,383	$25,036	$124,810	28
2017	1,893	$2,173,257	$25,036	$123,920	53
2018	1,680	$2,203,422	$0	$139,258	14
2019	788	$2,277,901	$0	$142,889	13
2020	911	$2,965,492	$0	$142,889	11
2021	669	$2,877,650	$123,131	$142,635	14
2022	1,292	$3,194,620	$32,241	$144,321	20
2023	1,042	$3,835,416	$32,241	$159,378	35

Consumers served, by year

2016977
20171,893
20181,680
2019788
2020911
2021669
20221,292
20231,042

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,681	43th	77th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,665	48th	76th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	65.3%	69th	69th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.3%	61th	71th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	3.36	77th	79th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	21.96	91th	91th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	88.9%	24th	31th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	13th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	79th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 31.0 of 38.0 FTE.
Equity index	15.0	73th	67th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	22.5%	41th	45th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 5.0% of income; Part B varied by 127.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (433) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	325	325	100.0%
Vocational services	194	194	100.0%
Recreational services	191	191	100.0%
Communication services	189	18	9.5%
IL skills training	143	143	100.0%
Peer counseling	141	141	100.0%
Youth transition	86	86	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	67	67	100.0%
Assistive technology	66	66	100.0%
Personal assistance	57	57	100.0%
Family services	56	56	100.0%
Transportation	18	18	100.0%
Preventive services	4	4	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	4	4	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,543	1,372	88.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Communication services: 18 of 189 requests filled (9.5%).
Advocacy and legal services: 67 of 67 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 66 of 66 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 56 of 56 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 325 of 325 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 143 of 143 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	69	51	18
Communication	1	0	1
Mobility and transportation	23	22	1
Community-based living	78	45	33
Educational	112	110	2
Vocational	213	156	57
Self-care	62	47	15
Information access and technology	52	48	4
Personal resource management	74	58	16
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	131	35	96
Community and social participation	218	102	116
Other	3	3	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	198
20 to 24	131
25 to 59	448
60 and older	260
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	426
Mental or emotional	132
Physical	368
Hearing	13
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	45
Other	47

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Michigan residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 55 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	631	63.9%	73.0%	0.88
Black or African American	283	28.7%	15.6%	1.83
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.6%	0.6%	0.96
Asian	33	3.3%	1.4%	2.31
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	3.33
Two or more races	8	0.8%	5.2%	0.16
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	25	2.5%	4.1%	0.62

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.