Suncoast Center for Independent Living, Inc.

What the center reported

509Consumers served158 carried over, 351 new
1,524Information and referral contacts
$1,368,009Total income
$193,660Part B
$293,269Part C
520Goals achievedof 828 set
6Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$193,660
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$293,269
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$714,202
State government funds	$113,332
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$53,546
Total income	$1,368,009

Eight years of reports

Suncoast Center for Independent Living, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	937	$492,270	$30,634	$212,740	0
2017	979	$563,550	$49,726	$214,960	11
2018	577	$539,314	$180,337	$245,490	3
2019	354	$536,166	$170,571	$255,560	1
2020	761	$560,842	$59,339	$256,298	0
2021	377	$577,098	$129,622	$257,331	3
2022	385	$581,690	$61,292	$266,096	1
2023	509	$1,368,009	$193,660	$293,269	6

Consumers served, by year

2016937
2017979
2018577
2019354
2020761
2021377
2022385
2023509

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,688	54th	53th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,631	73th	67th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	62.8%	65th	63th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	90.7%	86th	83th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.18	58th	61th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.05	57th	50th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	67th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	86.0%	68th	80th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	34.4	26th	24th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	41.7%	12th	11th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 35.6% of income; Part B varied by 56.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,524) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	320	320	100.0%
IL skills training	80	80	100.0%
Assistive technology	60	60	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	50	50	100.0%
Transportation	48	48	100.0%
Mobility training	41	41	100.0%
Preventive services	37	37	100.0%
Peer counseling	25	25	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	12	12	100.0%
Youth transition	9	9	100.0%
Personal assistance	8	8	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
All services	691	691	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 50 of 50 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 60 of 60 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 80 of 80 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 41 of 41 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	78	30	41
Communication	1	1	0
Mobility and transportation	182	121	40
Community-based living	13	6	5
Self-care	241	184	54
Information access and technology	101	70	22
Personal resource management	140	58	80
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	6	0
Community and social participation	24	12	9
Other	42	32	4

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	21
20 to 24	11
25 to 59	234
60 and older	242
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	47
Mental or emotional	26
Physical	373
Hearing	4
Vision	10
Multiple disabilities	49
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 10 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	175	35.1%	57.4%	0.61
Black or African American	76	15.2%	11.7%	1.30
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	2	0.4%	1.6%	0.25
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	2	0.4%	10.9%	0.04
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	244	48.9%	18.0%	2.71

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.