Disability Action Center

What the center reported

806Consumers served611 carried over, 195 new
2,830Information and referral contacts
$1,038,345Total income
$0Part B
$102,664Part C
487Goals achievedof 846 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$102,664
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$497,716
Local government funds	$69,167
Private and other	$368,797
Total income	$1,038,345

Eight years of reports

Disability Action Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	303	$537,064	$237,352	$80,359	0
2017	137	$461,074	$199,202	$80,664	0
2018	147	$183,234	$6,533	$90,839	1
2019	212	$540,233	$29,071	$93,567	1
2020	526	$506,245	$29,071	$93,567	2
2021	692	$542,938	$27,372	$93,401	0
2022	781	$538,956	$0	$94,505	1
2023	806	$1,038,345	$0	$102,664	2

Consumers served, by year

2016303
2017137
2018147
2019212
2020526
2021692
2022781
2023806

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,288	85th	88th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,132	78th	76th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	57.6%	59th	66th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	86.0%	76th	74th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.25	31th	29th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.95	55th	58th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	0.0%	1th	2th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 0 of 0 members.
Staff with disabilities	0.0%	1th	3th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 0.0 of 0.0 FTE.
Equity index	64.2	3th	3th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	40.3%	13th	9th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 9.9% of income; Part B varied by 134.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,830) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Recreational services	863	863	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	609	609	100.0%
Youth transition	308	308	100.0%
IL skills training	155	155	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	154	154	100.0%
Assistive technology	103	103	100.0%
Preventive services	57	57	100.0%
Communication services	53	53	100.0%
Mobility training	28	28	100.0%
Vocational services	23	23	100.0%
Transportation	19	19	100.0%
Personal assistance	17	17	100.0%
Mental restoration	4	4	100.0%
Counseling and related services	3	3	100.0%
Peer counseling	3	3	100.0%
Other services	2	2	100.0%
All services	2,401	2,401	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 154 of 154 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 103 of 103 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 53 of 53 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 609 of 609 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 155 of 155 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 28 of 28 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	214	149	60
Communication	34	12	22
Mobility and transportation	65	25	40
Community-based living	220	146	70
Educational	3	1	2
Vocational	8	1	6
Self-care	144	57	81
Information access and technology	88	57	27
Personal resource management	54	36	18
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	2	3
Community and social participation	8	0	8
Other	3	1	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	6
5 to 19	53
20 to 24	13
25 to 59	267
60 and older	467
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	80
Mental or emotional	52
Physical	419
Hearing	6
Vision	42
Multiple disabilities	205
Other	2

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	9	1.1%	42.3%	0.03
Black or African American	25	3.1%	6.4%	0.49
American Indian or Alaska Native	31	3.9%	1.2%	3.20
Asian	5	0.6%	10.2%	0.06
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	68	8.5%	0.4%	23.77
Two or more races	14	1.7%	11.9%	0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	652	81.1%	27.6%	2.93

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.