CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF SOUTH FL, INC

What the center reported

175Consumers served80 carried over, 95 new
918Information and referral contacts
$1,944,212Total income
$120,023Part B
$378,293Part C
133Goals achievedof 289 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$120,023
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$378,293
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$909,228
State government funds	$230,963
Local government funds	$198,653
Private and other	$107,052
Total income	$1,944,212

Eight years of reports

CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF SOUTH FL, INC by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	517	$1,370,850	$110,399	$274,417	0
2017	468	$1,422,250	$110,378	$277,281	0
2018	362	$1,511,596	$110,536	$316,662	0
2019	260	$1,568,051	$113,593	$329,651	0
2020	176	$1,453,910	$113,593	$330,603	8
2021	154	$1,754,939	$113,554	$331,936	1
2022	141	$1,584,442	$105,003	$343,242	0
2023	175	$1,944,212	$120,023	$378,293	0

Consumers served, by year

2016517
2017468
2018362
2019260
2020176
2021154
2022141
2023175

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$11,110	10th	2th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$14,618	24th	18th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	46.0%	45th	43th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	69.6%	54th	47th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	11th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	11th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	40th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	34th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 15.0 FTE.
Equity index	59.4	6th	3th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	11.3%	84th	86th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 25.6% of income; Part B varied by 3.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (918) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	70	70	100.0%
Assistive technology	46	46	100.0%
Other services	27	27	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	26	26	100.0%
Vocational services	24	24	100.0%
Youth transition	18	18	100.0%
Transportation	17	17	100.0%
Personal assistance	13	13	100.0%
Peer counseling	7	7	100.0%
Communication services	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
All services	251	251	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 26 of 26 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 46 of 46 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 70 of 70 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 17 of 17 requests filled (100.0%).
Youth transition: 18 of 18 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	5	2	3
Communication	4	3	1
Mobility and transportation	24	7	12
Community-based living	23	15	5
Educational	82	36	37
Vocational	20	6	12
Self-care	6	2	3
Information access and technology	19	14	4
Personal resource management	57	30	16
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	0	2
Community and social participation	46	18	26

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	16
20 to 24	22
25 to 59	110
60 and older	27
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	49
Mental or emotional	10
Physical	52
Hearing	45
Vision	4
Multiple disabilities	15
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	18	10.3%	57.4%	0.18
Black or African American	65	37.1%	11.7%	3.17
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	1.6%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.6%	0.0%	12.99
Two or more races	1	0.6%	10.9%	0.05
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	90	51.4%	18.0%	2.85

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.