ARISE

What the center reported

1,497Consumers served830 carried over, 667 new
1,507Information and referral contacts
$13,107,572Total income
$0Part B
$245,927Part C
217Goals achievedof 1,802 set
15Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$245,927
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$833,920
State government funds	$1,506,150
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$10,521,575
Total income	$13,107,572

Eight years of reports

ARISE by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,970	$15,532,036	$0	$186,449	46
2017	2,000	$16,789,159	$0	$158,609	73
2018	1,964	$17,676,604	$0	$207,634	109
2019	1,692	$16,367,307	$0	$222,593	41
2020	1,361	$18,445,480	$0	$222,593	31
2021	1,279	$14,276,745	$0	$222,197	19
2022	1,696	$12,965,574	$0	$224,824	12
2023	1,497	$13,107,572	$0	$245,927	15

Consumers served, by year

20161,970
20172,000
20181,964
20191,692
20201,361
20211,279
20221,696
20231,497

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$8,756	13th	41th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$60,404	5th	9th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	12.0%	10th	9th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	36.9%	28th	30th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.00	55th	57th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	6.10	75th	67th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.4%	50th	51th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	64.0%	29th	33th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	74.0%	43th	70th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 46.0 of 62.5 FTE.
Equity index	23.2	48th	44th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	12.2%	80th	79th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 1.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,507) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	714	712	99.7%
Housing and home modifications	343	343	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	275	269	97.8%
Family services	170	170	100.0%
Personal assistance	134	134	100.0%
IL skills training	132	130	98.5%
Youth transition	112	112	100.0%
Peer counseling	71	71	100.0%
Communication services	66	66	100.0%
Transportation	42	42	100.0%
Assistive technology	35	34	97.1%
Vocational services	35	35	100.0%
Recreational services	26	26	100.0%
Mobility training	22	21	95.5%
Counseling and related services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,180	2,168	99.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 21 of 22 requests filled (95.5%).
Assistive technology: 34 of 35 requests filled (97.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 269 of 275 requests filled (97.8%).
IL skills training: 130 of 132 requests filled (98.5%).
Other services: 712 of 714 requests filled (99.7%).
Communication services: 66 of 66 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	23	1	19
Communication	37	0	36
Mobility and transportation	33	7	15
Community-based living	888	99	677
Educational	292	58	202
Vocational	18	3	7
Self-care	135	8	112
Information access and technology	5	1	2
Personal resource management	54	10	32
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	95	15	56
Community and social participation	130	10	115
Other	92	5	80

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	19
5 to 19	345
20 to 24	29
25 to 59	542
60 and older	562
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	317
Mental or emotional	76
Physical	219
Hearing	2
Vision	5
Multiple disabilities	873
Other	5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 40 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	1,021	70.1%	53.5%	1.31
Black or African American	304	20.9%	15.0%	1.39
American Indian or Alaska Native	19	1.3%	0.6%	2.18
Asian	22	1.5%	5.2%	0.29
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	21	1.4%	7.8%	0.18
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	70	4.8%	17.9%	0.27

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.