Valley Association for Independent Living, Inc.

What the center reported

523Consumers served361 carried over, 162 new
4,148Information and referral contacts
$1,854,043Total income
$0Part B
$267,341Part C
171Goals achievedof 623 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$267,341
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$985,369
State government funds	$309,083
Local government funds	$8,810
Private and other	$283,440
Total income	$1,854,043

Eight years of reports

Valley Association for Independent Living, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	462	$1,809,879	$0	$939,136	0
2017	266	$2,111,337	$0	$195,868	0
2018	191	$1,941,165	$12,034	$223,135	1
2019	376	$1,639,990	$0	$231,791	0
2020	359	$1,954,228	$0	$232,238	0
2021	486	$2,064,873	$0	$233,607	12
2022	615	$2,092,335	$0	$241,727	3
2023	523	$1,854,043	$0	$267,341	0

Consumers served, by year

2016462
2017266
2018191
2019376
2020359
2021486
2022615
2023523

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,545	44th	40th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$10,842	29th	25th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	27.4%	23th	19th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	13.0%	11th	12th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	11th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	11th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	84.2%	18th	12th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	40th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	34th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 18.0 of 27.0 FTE.
Equity index	68.2	2th	1th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	7.8%	95th	94th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	8th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 14.4% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,148) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	145	116	80.0%
IL skills training	144	121	84.0%
Advocacy and legal services	130	95	73.1%
Youth transition	96	74	77.1%
Communication services	93	93	100.0%
Vocational services	93	86	92.5%
Other services	90	65	72.2%
Recreational services	64	45	70.3%
Transportation	54	33	61.1%
Peer counseling	44	37	84.1%
Counseling and related services	43	34	79.1%
Preventive services	27	20	74.1%
Physical restoration	24	14	58.3%
Housing and home modifications	20	62	310.0%
Family services	19	12	63.2%
Mobility training	18	11	61.1%
Personal assistance	17	30	176.5%
Rehabilitation technology	11	9	81.8%
Prostheses and orthotics	7	5	71.4%
Therapeutic treatment	5	2	40.0%
Children's services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	2	1	50.0%
All services	1,148	967	84.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Physical restoration: 14 of 24 requests filled (58.3%).
Mobility training: 11 of 18 requests filled (61.1%).
Transportation: 33 of 54 requests filled (61.1%).
Family services: 12 of 19 requests filled (63.2%).
Recreational services: 45 of 64 requests filled (70.3%).
Other services: 65 of 90 requests filled (72.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	25	4	21
Communication	79	19	60
Mobility and transportation	65	8	57
Community-based living	139	72	67
Educational	16	2	14
Vocational	34	7	27
Self-care	70	8	62
Information access and technology	150	46	104
Personal resource management	32	5	27
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	0	3
Community and social participation	7	0	7
Other	3	0	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	54
20 to 24	126
25 to 59	237
60 and older	103
Age unavailable	1

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	75
Mental or emotional	26
Physical	213
Hearing	104
Vision	41
Multiple disabilities	54
Other	10

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Texas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 6 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	24	4.6%	45.8%	0.10
Black or African American	2	0.4%	10.8%	0.04
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.6%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	2.3%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.1%	1.97
Two or more races	0	0.0%	13.7%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	490	94.8%	26.7%	3.55

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

More received a service than requested it. For at least one service type, the count receiving exceeds the count requesting.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.