Marin Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

663Consumers served222 carried over, 441 new
1,053Information and referral contacts
$3,751,821Total income
$9,465Part B
$88,778Part C
488Goals achievedof 732 set
88Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$9,465
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$88,778
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$126,385
State government funds	$1,885,928
Local government funds	$219,222
Private and other	$1,422,043
Total income	$3,751,821

Eight years of reports

Marin Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	666	$1,245,238	$21,696	$69,729	33
2017	719	$1,290,321	$19,624	$69,753	55
2018	686	$1,564,429	$7,450	$78,553	14
2019	673	$1,898,346	$7,450	$80,911	9
2020	728	$2,254,466	$0	$80,911	76
2021	1,010	$2,112,915	$12,520	$80,767	8
2022	1,113	$2,199,564	$20,440	$81,772	19
2023	663	$3,751,821	$9,465	$88,778	88

Consumers served, by year

2016666
2017719
2018686
2019673
2020728
20211,010
20221,113
2023663

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,659	22th	54th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$7,688	39th	64th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	66.7%	70th	74th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	66.3%	50th	59th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	13.27	93th	98th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	99.12	100th	99th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	13th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	52th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 12.0 of 18.0 FTE.
Equity index	26.8	39th	32th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	36.6%	17th	24th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 2.6% of income; Part B varied by 58.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,053) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	431	431	100.0%
Personal assistance	372	372	100.0%
Assistive technology	286	286	100.0%
Children's services	286	286	100.0%
IL skills training	224	224	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	164	164	100.0%
Peer counseling	121	121	100.0%
Youth transition	43	43	100.0%
Transportation	17	17	100.0%
Preventive services	16	16	100.0%
Vocational services	8	8	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	6	100.0%
Recreational services	5	5	100.0%
Family services	4	4	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	3	3	100.0%
Mental restoration	2	2	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,989	1,989	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 164 of 164 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 286 of 286 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 286 of 286 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 431 of 431 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 224 of 224 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 121 of 121 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	2	1	1
Communication	2	1	1
Mobility and transportation	15	12	3
Community-based living	257	193	64
Self-care	202	130	72
Information access and technology	74	37	37
Personal resource management	8	1	7
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	130	88	42
Community and social participation	8	7	1
Other	34	18	16

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	24
20 to 24	19
25 to 59	151
60 and older	456
Age unavailable	13

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	95
Mental or emotional	62
Physical	334
Hearing	5
Vision	8
Multiple disabilities	143
Other	16

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 60 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	416	69.0%	42.3%	1.63
Black or African American	32	5.3%	6.4%	0.83
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.8%	1.2%	0.69
Asian	21	3.5%	10.2%	0.34
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	0.5%	0.4%	1.40
Two or more races	11	1.8%	11.9%	0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	115	19.1%	27.6%	0.69

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.