Coalition For Independent Living Options, Inc.

What the center reported

2,996Consumers served2,501 carried over, 495 new
1,444Information and referral contacts
$6,007,883Total income
$474,204Part B
$359,655Part C
944Goals achievedof 3,934 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$474,204
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$359,655
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,483,718
State government funds	$722,420
Local government funds	$375,029
Private and other	$2,592,857
Total income	$6,007,883

Eight years of reports

Coalition For Independent Living Options, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C
2016	2,729	$1,488,115	$79,245	$260,896
2017	2,159	$1,651,465	$79,787	$263,619
2018	2,189	$1,770,096	$73,192	$301,060
2019	2,300	$2,051,068	$82,554	$313,410
2020	2,592	$2,401,470	$416,596	$314,315
2021	2,977	$2,933,460	$417,974	$315,582
2022	3,260	$2,944,207	$417,974	$326,331
2023	2,996	$6,007,883	$474,204	$359,655

Consumers served, by year

20162,729
20172,159
20182,189
20192,300
20202,592
20212,977
20223,260
20232,996

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,005	70th	91th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$6,364	46th	71th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	24.0%	19th	19th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	86.9%	78th	85th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	9th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	9th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.1%	47th	49th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	78.0%	63th	74th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	84.0%	64th	86th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 27.0 of 32.0 FTE.
Equity index	23.5	48th	42th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	51.5%	8th	8th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 13.9% of income; Part B varied by 69.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,444) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	931	926	99.5%
Youth transition	524	523	99.8%
Advocacy and legal services	409	407	99.5%
IL skills training	210	208	99.0%
Communication services	182	182	100.0%
Assistive technology	16	16	100.0%
Peer counseling	15	8	53.3%
Housing and home modifications	13	13	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Transportation	10	10	100.0%
Vocational services	9	9	100.0%
Family services	7	6	85.7%
Children's services	5	5	100.0%
Recreational services	5	2	40.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Counseling and related services	3	2	66.7%
Prostheses and orthotics	2	2	100.0%
Mobility training	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,358	2,336	99.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Peer counseling: 8 of 15 requests filled (53.3%).
IL skills training: 208 of 210 requests filled (99.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 407 of 409 requests filled (99.5%).
Other services: 926 of 931 requests filled (99.5%).
Youth transition: 523 of 524 requests filled (99.8%).
Assistive technology: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	512	147	365
Communication	79	2	77
Mobility and transportation	52	4	48
Community-based living	173	0	173
Educational	1,024	403	621
Vocational	394	209	185
Self-care	562	9	553
Information access and technology	13	1	12
Personal resource management	1,003	165	838
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	36	0	36
Community and social participation	38	3	35
Other	48	1	47

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	18
5 to 19	766
20 to 24	413
25 to 59	1,003
60 and older	796
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	479
Mental or emotional	501
Physical	889
Hearing	81
Vision	84
Multiple disabilities	30
Other	932

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 235 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	1,260	45.6%	57.4%	0.80
Black or African American	968	35.1%	11.7%	2.99
American Indian or Alaska Native	9	0.3%	0.3%	1.11
Asian	33	1.2%	1.6%	0.74
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	4	0.1%	0.0%	3.29
Two or more races	76	2.8%	10.9%	0.25
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	411	14.9%	18.0%	0.83

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.