ARISE

What the center reported

435Consumers served287 carried over, 148 new
189Information and referral contacts
$4,337,989Total income
$0Part B
$218,715Part C
111Goals achievedof 604 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$218,715
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$77,250
State government funds	$142,363
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$3,899,661
Total income	$4,337,989

Eight years of reports

ARISE by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	734	$3,667,125	$0	$165,818	0
2017	785	$4,782,157	$0	$164,837	1
2018	648	$4,927,878	$0	$184,661	1
2019	547	$4,875,004	$0	$197,963	3
2020	427	$3,976,541	$0	$197,963	3
2021	394	$4,127,052	$0	$197,611	1
2022	536	$4,477,724	$0	$199,947	0
2023	435	$4,337,989	$0	$218,715	1

Consumers served, by year

2016734
2017785
2018648
2019547
2020427
2021394
2022536
2023435

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$9,972	12th	38th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$39,081	9th	18th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	18.4%	15th	13th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	70.8%	54th	65th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.23	30th	29th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.46	32th	26th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	64.0%	29th	33th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	72.0%	40th	67th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 12.7 of 17.7 FTE.
Equity index	41.3	17th	11th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	9.7%	90th	94th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 5.0% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (189) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	180	180	100.0%
Family services	122	122	100.0%
Other services	105	105	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	103	103	100.0%
Personal assistance	89	89	100.0%
Transportation	61	61	100.0%
Youth transition	54	54	100.0%
Recreational services	50	50	100.0%
IL skills training	40	40	100.0%
Communication services	31	31	100.0%
Vocational services	29	29	100.0%
Peer counseling	22	22	100.0%
Assistive technology	10	10	100.0%
Mobility training	7	7	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	904	904	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 180 of 180 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 103 of 103 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 40 of 40 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	13	0	12
Communication	22	0	19
Mobility and transportation	35	25	10
Community-based living	72	5	57
Educational	140	33	105
Vocational	34	12	20
Self-care	86	7	72
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	35	3	27
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	1	4
Community and social participation	93	18	71
Other	66	7	55

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	163
20 to 24	36
25 to 59	132
60 and older	101
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	137
Mental or emotional	34
Physical	66
Hearing	0
Vision	2
Multiple disabilities	192
Other	4

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	409	94.7%	53.5%	1.77
Black or African American	7	1.6%	15.0%	0.11
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.6%	0.39
Asian	0	0.0%	5.2%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.1%	4.22
Two or more races	5	1.2%	7.8%	0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	9	2.1%	17.9%	0.12

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.