Lifetime Independence for Everyone, Inc.

What the center reported

611Consumers served363 carried over, 248 new
8,620Information and referral contacts
$3,358,730Total income
$29,587Part B
$268,052Part C
740Goals achievedof 1,849 set
20Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$29,587
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$268,052
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$2,078,428
State government funds	$39,694
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$942,969
Total income	$3,358,730

Eight years of reports

Lifetime Independence for Everyone, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	783	$2,540,320	$598,822	$194,362	11
2017	783	$3,246,332	$112,901	$196,390	29
2018	747	$3,185,330	$140,704	$223,730	59
2019	647	$3,000,560	$0	$232,409	43
2020	568	$3,113,291	$0	$232,857	30
2021	574	$3,054,040	$0	$234,229	37
2022	605	$3,884,312	$0	$242,371	25
2023	611	$3,358,730	$29,587	$268,052	20

Consumers served, by year

2016783
2017783
2018747
2019647
2020568
2021574
2022605
2023611

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,497	23th	56th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,539	58th	85th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	40.0%	37th	36th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.9%	63th	73th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	3.27	77th	78th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	7.46	78th	72th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	81.9%	16th	19th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	90.0%	74th	91th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 18.0 of 20.0 FTE.
Equity index	17.0	66th	61th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	11.1%	86th	88th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 8.9% of income; Part B varied by 174.1% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (8,620) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	464	407	87.7%
Other services	334	333	99.7%
Assistive technology	112	31	27.7%
Housing and home modifications	112	75	67.0%
IL skills training	85	80	94.1%
Recreational services	55	49	89.1%
Peer counseling	50	41	82.0%
Transportation	40	25	62.5%
Communication services	34	21	61.8%
Youth transition	28	28	100.0%
Preventive services	26	21	80.8%
Physical restoration	21	17	81.0%
Personal assistance	19	12	63.2%
Vocational services	12	7	58.3%
Prostheses and orthotics	10	2	20.0%
Mental restoration	7	6	85.7%
Mobility training	4	1	25.0%
Counseling and related services	2	2	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,416	1,159	81.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Prostheses and orthotics: 2 of 10 requests filled (20.0%).
Assistive technology: 31 of 112 requests filled (27.7%).
Vocational services: 7 of 12 requests filled (58.3%).
Communication services: 21 of 34 requests filled (61.8%).
Transportation: 25 of 40 requests filled (62.5%).
Personal assistance: 12 of 19 requests filled (63.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	52	20	26
Communication	44	14	17
Mobility and transportation	98	25	56
Community-based living	100	32	49
Educational	3	0	2
Vocational	22	6	10
Self-care	170	61	85
Information access and technology	17	7	6
Personal resource management	191	100	56
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	26	20	4
Community and social participation	42	6	10
Other	1,084	449	454

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	16
25 to 59	275
60 and older	313
Age unavailable	1

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	17
Mental or emotional	53
Physical	191
Hearing	8
Vision	5
Multiple disabilities	316
Other	21

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Texas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 14 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	258	43.2%	45.8%	0.94
Black or African American	91	15.2%	10.8%	1.41
American Indian or Alaska Native	42	7.0%	0.6%	11.93
Asian	2	0.3%	2.3%	0.14
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.1%	1.70
Two or more races	7	1.2%	13.7%	0.09
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	196	32.8%	26.7%	1.23

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.