Center for Independent Living of Broward

What the center reported

819Consumers served332 carried over, 487 new
5,920Information and referral contacts
$2,496,663Total income
$84,381Part B
$363,221Part C
690Goals achievedof 1,045 set
15Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$84,381
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$363,221
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,075,313
State government funds	$181,521
Local government funds	$257,550
Private and other	$534,677
Total income	$2,496,663

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living of Broward by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,308	$1,211,574	$77,751	$263,483	1
2017	1,226	$1,292,025	$71,278	$265,758	0
2018	1,116	$1,505,773	$77,509	$304,045	0
2019	1,150	$1,599,492	$400,769	$316,517	1
2020	1,091	$1,425,689	$79,773	$317,431	6
2021	936	$2,243,766	$79,725	$318,711	2
2022	859	$1,928,988	$74,473	$329,567	11
2023	819	$2,496,663	$84,381	$363,221	15

Consumers served, by year

20161,308
20171,226
20181,116
20191,150
20201,091
2021936
2022859
2023819

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,048	50th	83th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,618	67th	90th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	66.0%	69th	72th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	93.2%	89th	94th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.83	68th	73th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	4.13	68th	58th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.1%	47th	49th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	59th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	64.0%	25th	45th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 14.0 of 22.0 FTE.
Equity index	44.0	13th	8th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	25.4%	37th	44th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 17.9% of income; Part B varied by 90.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,920) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	341	339	99.4%
Housing and home modifications	278	278	100.0%
Youth transition	201	200	99.5%
IL skills training	197	196	99.5%
Assistive technology	170	165	97.1%
Vocational services	94	91	96.8%
Preventive services	63	62	98.4%
Counseling and related services	53	52	98.1%
Other services	50	50	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	48	48	100.0%
Recreational services	44	44	100.0%
Family services	17	16	94.1%
Transportation	13	13	100.0%
Communication services	12	12	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	10	10	100.0%
Children's services	6	6	100.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Personal assistance	3	3	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Mobility training	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,606	1,591	99.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Family services: 16 of 17 requests filled (94.1%).
Vocational services: 91 of 94 requests filled (96.8%).
Assistive technology: 165 of 170 requests filled (97.1%).
Counseling and related services: 52 of 53 requests filled (98.1%).
Preventive services: 62 of 63 requests filled (98.4%).
Peer counseling: 339 of 341 requests filled (99.4%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	30	24	6
Communication	10	10	0
Mobility and transportation	41	38	1
Community-based living	143	27	86
Educational	169	60	108
Vocational	178	131	45
Self-care	40	38	1
Information access and technology	145	133	11
Personal resource management	170	154	6
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	55	15	40
Community and social participation	61	60	1
Other	3	0	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	128
20 to 24	110
25 to 59	314
60 and older	266
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	143
Mental or emotional	143
Physical	245
Hearing	99
Vision	11
Multiple disabilities	107
Other	71

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 17 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	195	24.3%	57.4%	0.42
Black or African American	410	51.1%	11.7%	4.36
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.4%	0.3%	1.27
Asian	10	1.2%	1.6%	0.77
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	4	0.5%	0.0%	11.34
Two or more races	3	0.4%	10.9%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	177	22.1%	18.0%	1.22

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.