Regional Access & Mobilization Project

What the center reported

157Consumers served68 carried over, 89 new
490Information and referral contacts
$361,550Total income
$4,736Part B
$51,767Part C
127Goals achievedof 177 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$4,736
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$51,767
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$74,822
State government funds	$115,609
Local government funds	$45,183
Private and other	$69,433
Total income	$361,550

Eight years of reports

Regional Access & Mobilization Project by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	111	$364,167	$11,643	$42,445	3
2017	103	$292,500	$10,690	$41,377	3
2018	113	$291,210	$4,126	$46,260	3
2019	108	$261,881	$5,980	$47,306	21
2020	116	$353,114	$9,241	$47,306	2
2021	151	$380,964	$9,283	$47,222	2
2022	164	$435,516	$8,755	$47,780	3
2023	157	$361,550	$4,736	$51,767	2

Consumers served, by year

2016111
2017103
2018113
2019108
2020116
2021151
2022164
2023157

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,303	61th	38th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,847	72th	59th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	71.8%	78th	75th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	49.5%	37th	38th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.27	60th	59th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	3.86	67th	74th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	54.0%	5th	1th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 13 members.
Staff with disabilities	80.0%	54th	30th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 5.0 FTE.
Equity index	12.2	80th	83th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	15.5%	68th	71th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 15.6% of income; Part B varied by 32.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (490) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	64	64	100.0%
Personal assistance	42	42	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	41	41	100.0%
Children's services	24	24	100.0%
Vocational services	18	18	100.0%
Preventive services	15	15	100.0%
IL skills training	14	14	100.0%
Youth transition	14	14	100.0%
Assistive technology	6	6	100.0%
Peer counseling	6	6	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	5	5	100.0%
Transportation	3	3	100.0%
Communication services	1	1	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Other services	1	1	100.0%
All services	256	256	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 41 of 41 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 24 of 24 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 64 of 64 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 42 of 42 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	13	11	2
Communication	2	2	0
Mobility and transportation	6	2	4
Community-based living	38	30	8
Educational	25	17	8
Vocational	21	14	7
Self-care	43	30	13
Information access and technology	2	2	0
Personal resource management	19	17	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	2	5
Community and social participation	1	0	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	35
20 to 24	6
25 to 59	82
60 and older	32
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	39
Mental or emotional	32
Physical	76
Hearing	4
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	3

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	96	61.9%	61.7%	1.00
Black or African American	44	28.4%	16.5%	1.72
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.5%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	3.4%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	7	4.5%	6.4%	0.70
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	8	5.2%	11.6%	0.45

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.