RISE- Resource, Information, Support and Empowerment

What the center reported

600Consumers served500 carried over, 100 new
1,858Information and referral contacts
$640,159Total income
$0Part B
$370,352Part C
385Goals achievedof 1,548 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$370,352
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$50,818
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$4,201
Private and other	$214,788
Total income	$640,159

Eight years of reports

RISE- Resource, Information, Support and Empowerment by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	482	$648,864	$0	$268,540	54
2017	564	$643,727	$0	$271,342	23
2018	684	$785,350	$0	$309,116	43
2019	752	$963,366	$0	$321,106	16
2020	517	$881,654	$0	$321,725	15
2021	523	$728,258	$0	$323,621	10
2022	598	$596,068	$0	$334,870	12
2023	600	$640,159	$0	$370,352	8

Consumers served, by year

2016482
2017564
2018684
2019752
2020517
2021523
2022598
2023600

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,067	89th	91th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,663	83th	85th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	24.9%	20th	21th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	0.0%	3th	2th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.33	62th	55th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.16	58th	62th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	60th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 4 members.
Staff with disabilities	80.0%	54th	47th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 5.0 FTE.
Equity index	38.0	19th	20th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.7%	62th	58th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 57.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,858) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	591	591	100.0%
Peer counseling	560	560	100.0%
IL skills training	529	529	100.0%
Other services	528	528	100.0%
Transportation	523	523	100.0%
Communication services	520	520	100.0%
Vocational services	519	519	100.0%
Preventive services	343	343	100.0%
Assistive technology	111	111	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	18	18	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	4,244	4,244	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 591 of 591 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 111 of 111 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 520 of 520 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 18 of 18 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 529 of 529 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 560 of 560 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	94	0	94
Communication	90	0	90
Mobility and transportation	163	41	122
Community-based living	501	309	192
Educational	68	4	64
Vocational	79	4	75
Self-care	82	5	77
Information access and technology	101	8	93
Personal resource management	70	3	67
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	67	8	59
Community and social participation	214	3	211
Other	19	0	19

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	7
20 to 24	7
25 to 59	193
60 and older	392
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	41
Mental or emotional	58
Physical	254
Hearing	78
Vision	27
Multiple disabilities	121
Other	21

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Texas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 114 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	270	55.6%	45.8%	1.21
Black or African American	190	39.1%	10.8%	3.60
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.6%	0.35
Asian	0	0.0%	2.3%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	13.7%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	25	5.1%	26.7%	0.19

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.