KEYS ADVOCACY CENTER, INC.

What the center reported

401Consumers served243 carried over, 158 new
841Information and referral contacts
$950,504Total income
$97,536Part B
$274,685Part C
581Goals achievedof 741 set
17Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$97,536
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$274,685
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$395,446
State government funds	$68,781
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$114,056
Total income	$950,504

Eight years of reports

KEYS ADVOCACY CENTER, INC. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	356	$580,384	$28,264	$199,257	0
2017	317	$541,901	$73,008	$201,338	1
2018	405	$619,179	$84,477	$229,933	3
2019	366	$622,363	$79,954	$239,365	0
2020	299	$669,289	$81,006	$240,056	1
2021	435	$685,446	$92,080	$241,024	8
2022	354	$1,033,136	$99,076	$249,234	9
2023	401	$950,504	$97,536	$274,685	17

Consumers served, by year

2016356
2017317
2018405
2019366
2020299
2021435
2022354
2023401

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,370	59th	53th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,636	83th	86th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	78.4%	84th	87th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	95.2%	92th	92th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	4.24	79th	77th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	6.19	76th	81th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	79th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	86.0%	68th	63th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	21.1	53th	58th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	23.6%	39th	32th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 39.2% of income; Part B varied by 26.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (841) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	146	146	100.0%
Assistive technology	109	109	100.0%
Other services	77	77	100.0%
Preventive services	48	48	100.0%
IL skills training	38	38	100.0%
Peer counseling	33	33	100.0%
Communication services	22	22	100.0%
Youth transition	14	14	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	11	11	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	6	100.0%
Family services	5	5	100.0%
Transportation	4	4	100.0%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	521	521	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 146 of 146 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 109 of 109 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 22 of 22 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 38 of 38 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 33 of 33 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	40	27	12
Communication	28	23	5
Mobility and transportation	17	12	5
Community-based living	192	166	26
Educational	23	21	2
Vocational	14	8	6
Self-care	216	173	43
Information access and technology	27	19	8
Personal resource management	92	71	21
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	22	17	5
Community and social participation	70	44	26

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	10
20 to 24	8
25 to 59	82
60 and older	301
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	23
Mental or emotional	32
Physical	297
Hearing	3
Vision	8
Multiple disabilities	35
Other	3

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	272	68.0%	57.4%	1.19
Black or African American	12	3.0%	11.7%	0.26
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	1	0.2%	1.6%	0.15
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.0%	5.68
Two or more races	1	0.2%	10.9%	0.02
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	113	28.2%	18.0%	1.57

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.