Independent Living Resources of Solano & Contra Costa Counties

What the center reported

252Consumers served11 carried over, 241 new
7,953Information and referral contacts
$1,296,646Total income
$0Part B
$134,041Part C
523Goals achievedof 528 set
10Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$134,041
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$139,000
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$723,829
Local government funds	$268,605
Private and other	$31,171
Total income	$1,296,646

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resources of Solano & Contra Costa Counties by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	343	$612,017	$0	$105,281	0
2017	367	$550,284	$0	$105,317	2
2018	979	$628,871	$15,131	$118,602	1
2019	580	$662,303	$28,571	$122,164	0
2020	741	$654,332	$28,571	$122,164	1
2021	563	$628,247	$0	$121,947	6
2022	668	$745,761	$0	$123,388	12
2023	252	$1,296,646	$0	$134,041	10

Consumers served, by year

2016343
2017367
2018979
2019580
2020741
2021563
2022668
2023252

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,145	26th	17th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,479	74th	68th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	99.1%	99th	98th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	97.7%	96th	91th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	3.97	78th	79th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	7.46	78th	75th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	97.5%	41th	39th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	51.0%	4th	4th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 8.4 of 16.5 FTE.
Equity index	25.7	42th	40th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	30.9%	27th	27th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	2	0th	1th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 21.1% of income; Part B varied by 136.1% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (7,953) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	187	187	100.0%
Assistive technology	178	178	100.0%
Counseling and related services	175	175	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	125	125	100.0%
IL skills training	73	72	98.6%
Peer counseling	59	59	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	43	20	46.5%
Recreational services	25	25	100.0%
Mobility training	20	20	100.0%
Transportation	20	20	100.0%
Vocational services	16	16	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Youth transition	10	10	100.0%
Children's services	5	5	100.0%
All services	947	923	97.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Rehabilitation technology: 20 of 43 requests filled (46.5%).
IL skills training: 72 of 73 requests filled (98.6%).
Advocacy and legal services: 125 of 125 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 178 of 178 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 175 of 175 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 187 of 187 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	175	175	0
Mobility and transportation	20	20	0
Community-based living	72	71	1
Educational	12	11	1
Vocational	11	8	3
Self-care	21	21	0
Information access and technology	167	167	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	10	10	0
Community and social participation	25	25	0
Other	15	15	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	5
25 to 59	87
60 and older	153
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	21
Mental or emotional	15
Physical	170
Hearing	13
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	11
Other	21

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	109	43.8%	42.3%	1.03
Black or African American	73	29.3%	6.4%	4.61
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.8%	1.2%	0.67
Asian	24	9.6%	10.2%	0.95
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	4	1.6%	0.4%	4.52
Two or more races	1	0.4%	11.9%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	36	14.5%	27.6%	0.52

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

Disability table does not match total served. The disability-type rows do not add up to consumers served.
Goal achievement at or above 98%. With 20 or more goals set, nearly every goal was achieved, which can mean goals are recorded as set and achieved at the same time.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.