Southern California Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

What the center reported

492Consumers served222 carried over, 270 new
757Information and referral contacts
$8,178,540Total income
$0Part B
$323,095Part C
330Goals achievedof 624 set
9Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$323,095
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$135,367
State government funds	$495,118
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$7,224,960
Total income	$8,178,540

Eight years of reports

Southern California Rehabilitation Services, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	564	$253,769	$0	$253,769	0
2017	306	$320,707	$0	$253,857	0
2018	167	$326,759	$0	$285,879	1
2019	197	$702,595	$0	$294,465	5
2020	150	$1,233,926	$0	$294,465	10
2021	300	$2,709,162	$0	$293,942	10
2022	467	$4,133,514	$0	$297,417	11
2023	492	$8,178,540	$0	$323,095	9

Consumers served, by year

2016564
2017306
2018167
2019197
2020150
2021300
2022467
2023492

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$16,623	5th	16th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$24,783	13th	25th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	52.9%	52th	49th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	49.8%	37th	42th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.83	68th	73th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.79	63th	53th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	86.3%	20th	25th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	80th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	92.0%	76th	92th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 12.0 FTE.
Equity index	48.1	10th	4th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	116.1%	1th	1th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.0% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (757) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	127	121	95.3%
Assistive technology	50	45	90.0%
Other services	37	33	89.2%
IL skills training	33	29	87.9%
Vocational services	33	24	72.7%
Transportation	29	27	93.1%
Peer counseling	26	15	57.7%
Housing and home modifications	23	20	87.0%
Youth transition	23	17	73.9%
Communication services	18	15	83.3%
Counseling and related services	14	14	100.0%
Recreational services	9	5	55.6%
Mobility training	7	5	71.4%
Personal assistance	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	432	373	86.3%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Peer counseling: 15 of 26 requests filled (57.7%).
Vocational services: 24 of 33 requests filled (72.7%).
Youth transition: 17 of 23 requests filled (73.9%).
Communication services: 15 of 18 requests filled (83.3%).
Housing and home modifications: 20 of 23 requests filled (87.0%).
IL skills training: 29 of 33 requests filled (87.9%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	127	39	50
Communication	36	30	6
Mobility and transportation	100	60	40
Community-based living	111	52	59
Educational	24	16	8
Vocational	32	24	8
Self-care	50	25	25
Information access and technology	32	20	12
Personal resource management	47	27	20
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	14	9	5
Community and social participation	16	8	8
Other	35	20	15

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	16
20 to 24	59
25 to 59	204
60 and older	208
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	71
Mental or emotional	85
Physical	149
Hearing	3
Vision	12
Multiple disabilities	152
Other	20

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 6 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	42	8.6%	42.3%	0.20
Black or African American	32	6.6%	6.4%	1.04
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	1.2%	0.17
Asian	40	8.2%	10.2%	0.81
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.4%	0.58
Two or more races	3	0.6%	11.9%	0.05
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	367	75.5%	27.6%	2.73

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.