Illinois Valley Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

86Consumers served63 carried over, 23 new
736Information and referral contacts
$636,604Total income
$3,602Part B
$27,271Part C
55Goals achievedof 169 set
7Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$3,602
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$27,271
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$250,009
State government funds	$222,706
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$133,017
Total income	$636,604

Eight years of reports

Illinois Valley Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	86	$490,034	$0	$22,016	2
2017	113	$485,609	$0	$21,796	5
2018	107	$463,056	$0	$24,369	4
2019	91	$477,786	$0	$24,920	0
2020	137	$565,892	$0	$24,920	4
2021	142	$576,266	$0	$24,876	4
2022	136	$526,891	$0	$25,170	6
2023	86	$636,604	$3,602	$27,271	7

Consumers served, by year

201686
2017113
2018107
201991
2020137
2021142
2022136
202386

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$7,402	16th	6th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$11,575	28th	24th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	32.5%	29th	32th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	61.4%	46th	47th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	8.14	89th	90th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	25.67	93th	94th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	69th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	89th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 7.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	29.2	34th	34th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	10.7%	87th	86th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.8% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (736) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	57	57	100.0%
Peer counseling	48	48	100.0%
IL skills training	40	40	100.0%
Counseling and related services	34	34	100.0%
Transportation	29	29	100.0%
Youth transition	26	26	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	25	25	100.0%
Personal assistance	24	24	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	19	19	100.0%
Assistive technology	13	13	100.0%
Vocational services	12	12	100.0%
Recreational services	6	6	100.0%
Communication services	4	4	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
All services	338	338	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 34 of 34 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 19 of 19 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 40 of 40 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 48 of 48 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	15	4	11
Communication	3	1	2
Mobility and transportation	7	2	5
Community-based living	6	0	6
Educational	34	25	9
Vocational	10	3	7
Self-care	35	4	31
Information access and technology	3	0	3
Personal resource management	11	3	8
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	8	7	1
Community and social participation	36	6	30
Other	1	0	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	28
20 to 24	8
25 to 59	40
60 and older	10
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	27
Mental or emotional	11
Physical	22
Hearing	2
Vision	2
Multiple disabilities	2
Other	20

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 5 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	73	90.1%	61.7%	1.46
Black or African American	0	0.0%	16.5%	0.00
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	1.2%	0.5%	2.71
Asian	1	1.2%	3.4%	0.36
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	1	1.2%	6.4%	0.19
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	5	6.2%	11.6%	0.53

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.