Westchester Independent Living Center

What the center reported

3,080Consumers served577 carried over, 2,503 new
9,613Information and referral contacts
$6,217,383Total income
$0Part B
$252,499Part C
1,702Goals achievedof 6,670 set
178Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$252,499
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$5,810,234
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$154,650
Total income	$6,217,383

Eight years of reports

Westchester Independent Living Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	960	$2,221,704	$0	$191,430	5
2017	976	$2,315,924	$0	$190,298	8
2018	1,056	$2,558,435	$0	$213,183	2
2019	807	$4,014,260	$0	$228,541	14
2020	1,485	$4,137,624	$0	$228,541	6
2021	1,885	$4,965,793	$0	$228,135	2
2022	1,808	$5,326,861	$0	$230,832	148
2023	3,080	$6,217,383	$0	$252,499	178

Consumers served, by year

2016960
2017976
20181,056
2019807
20201,485
20211,885
20221,808
20233,080

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,019	69th	90th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,653	66th	89th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	25.5%	21th	22th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	23.5%	18th	23th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	5.78	84th	87th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	70.50	98th	94th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.6%	52th	54th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	73.0%	53th	65th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	61.0%	21th	38th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 35.8 of 58.7 FTE.
Equity index	8.6	91th	87th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	35.3%	20th	26th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.1% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (9,613) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	2,935	2,929	99.8%
Recreational services	2,155	2,153	99.9%
Assistive technology	302	302	100.0%
Other services	173	173	100.0%
IL skills training	130	126	96.9%
Housing and home modifications	65	64	98.5%
Peer counseling	41	41	100.0%
Transportation	20	17	85.0%
Personal assistance	19	15	78.9%
Vocational services	18	16	88.9%
Communication services	16	16	100.0%
Counseling and related services	16	12	75.0%
Family services	8	8	100.0%
Youth transition	7	7	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	3	3	100.0%
Mental restoration	2	2	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Mobility training	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	5,916	5,890	99.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Counseling and related services: 12 of 16 requests filled (75.0%).
Personal assistance: 15 of 19 requests filled (78.9%).
Transportation: 17 of 20 requests filled (85.0%).
Vocational services: 16 of 18 requests filled (88.9%).
IL skills training: 126 of 130 requests filled (96.9%).
Housing and home modifications: 64 of 65 requests filled (98.5%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	2,710	563	2,112
Communication	26	1	25
Mobility and transportation	34	0	33
Community-based living	2,563	546	1,980
Educational	57	8	48
Vocational	39	4	34
Self-care	85	17	65
Information access and technology	12	0	11
Personal resource management	753	381	351
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	367	178	184
Community and social participation	8	1	6
Other	16	3	13

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	62
20 to 24	60
25 to 59	325
60 and older	2,630
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	2,159
Mental or emotional	129
Physical	501
Hearing	4
Vision	8
Multiple disabilities	245
Other	34

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 43 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	1,696	55.8%	53.5%	1.04
Black or African American	528	17.4%	15.0%	1.16
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.2%	0.6%	0.27
Asian	274	9.0%	5.2%	1.73
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.0%	0.1%	0.60
Two or more races	8	0.3%	7.8%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	525	17.3%	17.9%	0.97

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.