Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc.

What the center reported

173Consumers served51 carried over, 122 new
1,499Information and referral contacts
$848,626Total income
$108,735Part B
$301,927Part C
444Goals achievedof 511 set
35Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$108,735
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$301,927
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$410,670
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$27,294
Total income	$848,626

Eight years of reports

Access to Independence of San Diego, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	509	$1,183,856	$105,241	$231,494	59
2017	338	$937,011	$95,920	$237,225	23
2018	272	$790,465	$61,418	$267,149	31
2019	262	$1,105,410	$101,731	$275,173	49
2020	285	$1,111,570	$180,243	$275,173	57
2021	260	$669,369	$60,853	$274,684	61
2022	160	$638,672	$24,173	$277,931	11
2023	173	$848,626	$108,735	$301,927	35

Consumers served, by year

2016509
2017338
2018272
2019262
2020285
2021260
2022160
2023173

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,905	27th	17th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,911	81th	81th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	86.9%	92th	94th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	67.9%	53th	52th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	20.23	98th	98th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	11.59	83th	88th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	89.6%	25th	22th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	79th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	78.0%	50th	43th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 5.1 FTE.
Equity index	18.7	60th	63th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	21.4%	46th	38th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 48.4% of income; Part B varied by 46.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,499) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	144	143	99.3%
IL skills training	131	120	91.6%
Peer counseling	129	118	91.5%
Assistive technology	118	117	99.2%
Transportation	118	113	95.8%
Other services	96	80	83.3%
Youth transition	70	66	94.3%
Housing and home modifications	33	12	36.4%
Preventive services	29	29	100.0%
Communication services	22	22	100.0%
Family services	21	21	100.0%
Children's services	20	20	100.0%
Personal assistance	20	6	30.0%
Vocational services	19	5	26.3%
Counseling and related services	18	13	72.2%
All services	988	885	89.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Vocational services: 5 of 19 requests filled (26.3%).
Personal assistance: 6 of 20 requests filled (30.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 12 of 33 requests filled (36.4%).
Counseling and related services: 13 of 18 requests filled (72.2%).
Other services: 80 of 96 requests filled (83.3%).
Peer counseling: 118 of 129 requests filled (91.5%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	115	109	15
Communication	10	10	0
Mobility and transportation	60	39	20
Community-based living	72	51	16
Educational	23	19	1
Vocational	20	20	0
Self-care	19	19	0
Information access and technology	39	28	6
Personal resource management	34	30	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	35	35	0
Community and social participation	45	45	0
Other	39	39	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	25
20 to 24	39
25 to 59	58
60 and older	51
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	75
Mental or emotional	12
Physical	39
Hearing	1
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	42
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	74	42.8%	42.3%	1.01
Black or African American	25	14.5%	6.4%	2.27
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	1.2%	0.00
Asian	5	2.9%	10.2%	0.28
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	1.7%	0.4%	4.87
Two or more races	3	1.7%	11.9%	0.15
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	63	36.4%	27.6%	1.32

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.