Resources for Independence Central Valley

What the center reported

685Consumers served411 carried over, 274 new
9,474Information and referral contacts
$2,502,780Total income
$0Part B
$317,150Part C
176Goals achievedof 869 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$317,150
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$133,178
State government funds	$1,777,821
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$274,631
Total income	$2,502,780

Eight years of reports

Resources for Independence Central Valley by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	191	$1,257,529	$0	$244,101	7
2017	96	$1,138,606	$0	$249,187	1
2018	95	$985,488	$0	$280,620	0
2019	188	$1,154,690	$0	$289,048	0
2020	251	$1,377,335	$0	$289,048	0
2021	291	$1,614,050	$0	$288,534	0
2022	624	$1,894,858	$0	$288,534	0
2023	685	$2,502,780	$0	$317,150	1

Consumers served, by year

2016191
201796
201895
2019188
2020251
2021291
2022624
2023685

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,654	43th	78th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$14,220	24th	48th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	20.3%	16th	16th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	50.4%	38th	44th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.15	25th	23th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.32	26th	19th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	80th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	65.0%	27th	47th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 17.0 FTE.
Equity index	21.6	52th	47th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	31.5%	26th	34th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 12.7% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (9,474) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	270	270	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	222	222	100.0%
Assistive technology	136	136	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	135	135	100.0%
Youth transition	99	99	100.0%
Preventive services	62	62	100.0%
Personal assistance	61	61	100.0%
Vocational services	57	57	100.0%
Communication services	51	51	100.0%
Peer counseling	51	51	100.0%
Recreational services	29	29	100.0%
Transportation	21	21	100.0%
Mobility training	9	9	100.0%
Mental restoration	7	7	100.0%
Counseling and related services	5	5	100.0%
All services	1,215	1,215	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 222 of 222 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 136 of 136 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 51 of 51 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 135 of 135 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 270 of 270 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 51 of 51 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	75	18	50
Communication	47	4	40
Mobility and transportation	44	6	34
Community-based living	124	28	73
Educational	25	3	19
Vocational	77	14	53
Self-care	63	5	52
Information access and technology	212	69	136
Personal resource management	18	6	8
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	11	1	10
Community and social participation	49	3	45
Other	124	19	90

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	38
5 to 19	110
20 to 24	60
25 to 59	304
60 and older	173
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	143
Mental or emotional	173
Physical	243
Hearing	9
Vision	38
Multiple disabilities	22
Other	57

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 62 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	223	35.8%	42.3%	0.85
Black or African American	96	15.4%	6.4%	2.42
American Indian or Alaska Native	14	2.2%	1.2%	1.87
Asian	23	3.7%	10.2%	0.36
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.4%	0.45
Two or more races	22	3.5%	11.9%	0.30
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	244	39.2%	27.6%	1.42

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.