IMPACT Inc.

What the center reported

410Consumers served250 carried over, 160 new
203Information and referral contacts
$953,012Total income
$144,564Part B
$27,270Part C
198Goals achievedof 292 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$144,564
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$27,270
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$121,365
Other federal funds	$114,623
State government funds	$481,863
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$63,327
Total income	$953,012

Eight years of reports

IMPACT Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	309	$935,715	$7,065	$23,064	2
2017	343	$821,486	$7,065	$21,796	5
2018	329	$788,289	$57,651	$24,369	6
2019	339	$904,568	$70,280	$24,920	3
2020	372	$943,990	$120,224	$24,920	2
2021	343	$922,650	$176,231	$24,876	3
2022	416	$979,852	$179,703	$25,170	0
2023	410	$953,012	$144,564	$27,270	0

Consumers served, by year

2016309
2017343
2018329
2019339
2020372
2021343
2022416
2023410

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,324	60th	54th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,813	54th	51th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	67.8%	72th	78th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	80.6%	69th	68th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	10th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	10th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	58.0%	16th	17th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 12 members.
Staff with disabilities	73.0%	42th	35th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 11.0 of 15.0 FTE.
Equity index	24.2	45th	48th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	6.9%	97th	95th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 30.8% of income; Part B varied by 68.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (203) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	122	122	100.0%
Youth transition	76	76	100.0%
Communication services	71	71	100.0%
Peer counseling	69	69	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	35	35	100.0%
Transportation	27	27	100.0%
Vocational services	24	24	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	23	23	100.0%
IL skills training	14	14	100.0%
Personal assistance	5	5	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
All services	468	468	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 71 of 71 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 23 of 23 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	33	30	3
Communication	67	42	25
Mobility and transportation	25	10	15
Community-based living	7	0	7
Educational	22	22	0
Vocational	24	16	8
Self-care	31	21	10
Information access and technology	32	30	2
Personal resource management	5	2	3
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	0	3
Community and social participation	7	4	3
Other	36	21	15

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	85
20 to 24	34
25 to 59	83
60 and older	197
Age unavailable	6

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	119
Mental or emotional	3
Physical	55
Hearing	26
Vision	182
Multiple disabilities	24
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	352	85.9%	61.7%	1.39
Black or African American	48	11.7%	16.5%	0.71
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.5%	0.54
Asian	2	0.5%	3.4%	0.14
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	2	0.5%	6.4%	0.08
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	5	1.2%	11.6%	0.11

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.