Achieving Independence and Mobility Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

407Consumers served296 carried over, 111 new
1,832Information and referral contacts
$1,002,680Total income
$0Part B
$27,270Part C
106Goals achievedof 624 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$27,270
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$283,557
State government funds	$636,737
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$55,116
Total income	$1,002,680

Eight years of reports

Achieving Independence and Mobility Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	111	$503,982	$0	$22,016	6
2017	143	$689,880	$48,539	$21,796	10
2018	247	$828,590	$40,029	$24,368	11
2019	276	$936,164	$35,751	$24,920	6
2020	237	$858,646	$2,821	$24,920	4
2021	331	$852,708	$0	$24,876	8
2022	397	$959,636	$0	$25,170	7
2023	407	$1,002,680	$0	$27,270	8

Consumers served, by year

2016111
2017143
2018247
2019276
2020237
2021331
2022397
2023407

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,464	58th	51th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$9,459	34th	33th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	17.0%	13th	13th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	19.5%	16th	14th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.97	69th	62th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	29.34	94th	95th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	39th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	52th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 11.0 FTE.
Equity index	11.7	82th	89th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	18.4%	56th	50th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 2.7% of income; Part B varied by 126.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,832) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Youth transition	288	288	100.0%
IL skills training	152	152	100.0%
Other services	99	99	100.0%
Communication services	57	57	100.0%
Peer counseling	57	57	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	55	55	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	37	37	100.0%
Vocational services	37	37	100.0%
Personal assistance	29	29	100.0%
Counseling and related services	19	19	100.0%
Transportation	14	14	100.0%
Family services	12	12	100.0%
Assistive technology	11	11	100.0%
Recreational services	3	3	100.0%
All services	870	870	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 37 of 37 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 57 of 57 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 19 of 19 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 55 of 55 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	51	23	28
Communication	21	2	19
Mobility and transportation	17	2	15
Community-based living	46	11	35
Educational	304	26	278
Vocational	50	5	45
Self-care	51	4	47
Information access and technology	11	9	2
Personal resource management	18	4	14
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	37	8	31
Community and social participation	18	12	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	132
20 to 24	159
25 to 59	71
60 and older	45
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	116
Mental or emotional	186
Physical	34
Hearing	34
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	29
Other	5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	223	55.2%	61.7%	0.90
Black or African American	52	12.9%	16.5%	0.78
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.5%	0.54
Asian	20	5.0%	3.4%	1.45
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.5%	0.0%	15.18
Two or more races	20	5.0%	6.4%	0.77
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	86	21.3%	11.6%	1.84

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.