ARISE

What the center reported

195Consumers served110 carried over, 85 new
122Information and referral contacts
$249,070Total income
$0Part B
$121,123Part C
53Goals achievedof 319 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$121,123
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$73,381
State government funds	$53,275
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$1,291
Total income	$249,070

Eight years of reports

ARISE by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	285	$1,184,968	$0	$91,826	2
2017	318	$958,950	$0	$91,284	6
2018	247	$942,978	$0	$102,261	7
2019	186	$717,028	$0	$109,630	0
2020	105	$563,113	$0	$109,630	1
2021	104	$805,555	$0	$109,435	1
2022	195	$543,767	$0	$110,729	0
2023	195	$249,070	$0	$121,123	1

Consumers served, by year

2016285
2017318
2018247
2019186
2020105
2021104
2022195
2023195

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,277	86th	69th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,699	56th	36th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	16.6%	12th	13th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	53.9%	40th	39th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.51	39th	35th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.83	42th	55th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	103.4%	99th	99th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	64.0%	29th	18th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	85.0%	66th	39th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.5 of 6.5 FTE.
Equity index	39.7	18th	27th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	36.8%	16th	17th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	3th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 48.6% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (122) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	109	109	100.0%
Other services	91	91	100.0%
IL skills training	57	57	100.0%
Communication services	35	35	100.0%
Family services	33	33	100.0%
Assistive technology	24	24	100.0%
Mobility training	16	15	93.8%
Housing and home modifications	15	15	100.0%
Recreational services	14	14	100.0%
Peer counseling	13	13	100.0%
Transportation	13	13	100.0%
Vocational services	7	7	100.0%
Personal assistance	6	6	100.0%
Youth transition	4	4	100.0%
Counseling and related services	3	3	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Mental restoration	0	16	—
All services	441	456	103.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 15 of 16 requests filled (93.8%).
Advocacy and legal services: 109 of 109 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 24 of 24 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 33 of 33 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	20	2	14
Communication	19	0	16
Mobility and transportation	3	0	2
Community-based living	22	5	15
Educational	59	9	45
Vocational	2	0	1
Self-care	18	0	17
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	66	30	22
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	1	1
Community and social participation	55	2	50
Other	47	4	42

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	75
20 to 24	8
25 to 59	76
60 and older	34
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	47
Mental or emotional	11
Physical	18
Hearing	0
Vision	0
Multiple disabilities	118
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 3 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	179	93.2%	53.5%	1.74
Black or African American	3	1.6%	15.0%	0.10
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.5%	0.6%	0.87
Asian	2	1.0%	5.2%	0.20
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	3	1.6%	7.8%	0.20
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	4	2.1%	17.9%	0.12

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

More received a service than requested it. For at least one service type, the count receiving exceeds the count requesting.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.