Center for Independence of the Disabled in New York INC

What the center reported

1,987Consumers served1,577 carried over, 410 new
1,294Information and referral contacts
$3,579,642Total income
$0Part B
$121,123Part C
26Goals achievedof 474 set
14Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$121,123
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,155,633
State government funds	$2,032,434
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$270,452
Total income	$3,579,642

Eight years of reports

Center for Independence of the Disabled in New York INC by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	697	$1,058,683	$0	$91,827	1
2017	831	$2,005,803	$0	$91,284	2
2018	1,012	$2,408,095	$0	$102,262	2
2019	854	$7,101,167	$0	$109,630	7
2020	508	$2,867,766	$0	$109,630	28
2021	970	$2,933,525	$0	$109,435	0
2022	1,552	$3,436,717	$0	$110,729	6
2023	1,987	$3,579,642	$0	$121,123	14

Consumers served, by year

2016697
2017831
20181,012
2019854
2020508
2021970
20221,552
20231,987

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,802	75th	95th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$137,679	2th	2th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	5.5%	4th	6th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	15.0%	13th	18th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.70	46th	52th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	11.56	83th	79th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	62.0%	24th	24th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 13 members.
Staff with disabilities	51.0%	4th	5th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 21.0 of 41.0 FTE.
Equity index	36.6	21th	17th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	52.5%	8th	6th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 3.4% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,294) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	580	580	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	303	303	100.0%
Other services	294	294	100.0%
Counseling and related services	117	117	100.0%
IL skills training	25	25	100.0%
Peer counseling	25	25	100.0%
Transportation	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	11	11	100.0%
Youth transition	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	4	4	100.0%
Assistive technology	1	1	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,382	1,382	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 580 of 580 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 117 of 117 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 303 of 303 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	1	0	1
Communication	1	0	1
Mobility and transportation	4	0	4
Community-based living	265	12	253
Educational	5	0	5
Vocational	5	0	5
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	1	0	1
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	166	14	152
Other	25	0	25

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	13
5 to 19	31
20 to 24	62
25 to 59	876
60 and older	1,005
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	290
Mental or emotional	306
Physical	1,154
Hearing	79
Vision	98
Multiple disabilities	36
Other	24

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 151 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	398	21.7%	53.5%	0.41
Black or African American	646	35.2%	15.0%	2.35
American Indian or Alaska Native	19	1.0%	0.6%	1.73
Asian	303	16.5%	5.2%	3.16
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	0.2%	0.1%	2.98
Two or more races	56	3.1%	7.8%	0.39
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	411	22.4%	17.9%	1.25

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.