Independent Living Resource Center, Inc.

What the center reported

656Consumers served209 carried over, 447 new
8,053Information and referral contacts
$2,807,511Total income
$0Part B
$201,834Part C
554Goals achievedof 947 set
29Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$201,834
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,110,733
State government funds	$442,220
Local government funds	$11,434
Private and other	$1,041,290
Total income	$2,807,511

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	546	$1,080,375	$0	$158,527	7
2017	496	$1,245,461	$0	$158,581	0
2018	553	$1,210,111	$0	$178,585	0
2019	550	$1,393,728	$0	$183,949	1
2020	452	$1,648,882	$0	$183,949	4
2021	510	$1,838,077	$0	$183,622	32
2022	519	$1,990,002	$0	$185,793	25
2023	656	$2,807,511	$0	$201,834	29

Consumers served, by year

2016546
2017496
2018553
2019550
2020452
2021510
2022519
2023656

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,280	33th	68th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,068	52th	78th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	58.5%	61th	58th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	78.3%	66th	77th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	4.42	80th	82th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.37	85th	81th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	69th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	88.0%	71th	89th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 22.0 of 25.0 FTE.
Equity index	19.4	57th	55th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	32.0%	25th	32th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 7.2% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (8,053) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	306	306	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	210	210	100.0%
Assistive technology	171	171	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	117	117	100.0%
Youth transition	86	86	100.0%
Vocational services	43	43	100.0%
Communication services	32	32	100.0%
Mobility training	29	29	100.0%
Personal assistance	26	26	100.0%
Transportation	24	24	100.0%
Peer counseling	20	20	100.0%
Counseling and related services	9	9	100.0%
Other services	5	5	100.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	4	4	100.0%
Mental restoration	3	3	100.0%
Preventive services	3	3	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,093	1,093	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 117 of 117 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 171 of 171 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 32 of 32 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 210 of 210 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 306 of 306 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 29 of 29 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	45	21	24
Communication	23	10	7
Mobility and transportation	57	37	18
Community-based living	268	123	137
Educational	14	7	7
Vocational	40	28	10
Self-care	64	33	27
Information access and technology	153	113	36
Personal resource management	127	84	37
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	51	29	9
Community and social participation	35	20	13
Other	70	49	14

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	9
5 to 19	32
20 to 24	32
25 to 59	254
60 and older	326
Age unavailable	3

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	71
Mental or emotional	148
Physical	203
Hearing	15
Vision	56
Multiple disabilities	140
Other	23

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 48 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	326	53.6%	42.3%	1.27
Black or African American	32	5.3%	6.4%	0.83
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.8%	1.2%	0.68
Asian	13	2.1%	10.2%	0.21
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.3%	0.4%	0.92
Two or more races	13	2.1%	11.9%	0.18
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	217	35.7%	27.6%	1.29

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.