Independent Living Resource Center San Francisco

What the center reported

603Consumers served460 carried over, 143 new
1,695Information and referral contacts
$981,407Total income
$0Part B
$300,665Part C
302Goals achievedof 765 set
3Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$300,665
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$429,700
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$63,536
Private and other	$187,506
Total income	$981,407

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resource Center San Francisco by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	579	$621,958	$0	$236,154	0
2017	505	$701,304	$0	$236,235	0
2018	539	$714,272	$0	$266,034	1
2019	629	$816,139	$7,282	$274,024	5
2020	765	$731,102	$0	$274,024	13
2021	598	$742,757	$0	$273,537	1
2022	803	$860,337	$0	$276,770	2
2023	603	$981,407	$0	$300,665	3

Consumers served, by year

2016579
2017505
2018539
2019629
2020765
2021598
2022803
2023603

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,628	79th	76th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,250	69th	67th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	39.5%	36th	41th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	43.9%	33th	29th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.50	38th	33th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.00	44th	46th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	51th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	89th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 2.0 of 2.0 FTE.
Equity index	26.2	40th	40th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.5%	76th	75th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 30.6% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,695) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	460	460	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	205	205	100.0%
Counseling and related services	124	124	100.0%
Assistive technology	70	70	100.0%
Peer counseling	63	63	100.0%
Other services	56	56	100.0%
Recreational services	36	36	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	27	27	100.0%
IL skills training	26	26	100.0%
Communication services	8	8	100.0%
Youth transition	8	8	100.0%
Children's services	7	7	100.0%
Family services	5	5	100.0%
Transportation	5	5	100.0%
Personal assistance	4	4	100.0%
Vocational services	4	4	100.0%
Preventive services	2	2	100.0%
All services	1,110	1,110	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 205 of 205 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 70 of 70 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 124 of 124 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 460 of 460 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 26 of 26 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 63 of 63 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	23	9	14
Mobility and transportation	49	39	10
Community-based living	417	36	381
Educational	1	1	0
Self-care	7	2	5
Information access and technology	70	46	24
Personal resource management	159	142	17
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	3	0
Community and social participation	36	24	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	7
20 to 24	8
25 to 59	355
60 and older	233
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	13
Mental or emotional	130
Physical	156
Hearing	5
Vision	21
Multiple disabilities	252
Other	26

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 13 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	105	17.8%	42.3%	0.42
Black or African American	160	27.1%	6.4%	4.27
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.5%	1.2%	0.42
Asian	60	10.2%	10.2%	1.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	8	1.4%	0.4%	3.81
Two or more races	65	11.0%	11.9%	0.92
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	189	32.0%	27.6%	1.16

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.