Living Independently is For Everyone at RCIL, Inc.

What the center reported

1,081Consumers served720 carried over, 361 new
3,095Information and referral contacts
$12,399,705Total income
$19,773Part B
$116,091Part C
288Goals achievedof 1,689 set
11Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
6Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$19,773
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$116,091
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$354,388
State government funds	$3,332,806
Local government funds	$209,126
Private and other	$8,367,521
Total income	$12,399,705

Eight years of reports

Living Independently is For Everyone at RCIL, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	—	—	—	—	—
2017	—	—	—	—	—
2018	497	$7,282,787	$29,995	$98,013	1
2019	1,479	$7,318,372	$0	$105,075	3
2020	1,542	$8,810,860	$0	$105,075	10
2021	1,449	$9,289,663	$12,882	$104,889	1
2022	1,466	$11,257,895	$21,131	$106,129	8
2023	1,081	$12,399,705	$19,773	$116,091	11

Consumers served, by year

2016—
2017—
2018497
20191,479
20201,542
20211,449
20221,466
20231,081

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$11,471	10th	32th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$43,055	7th	17th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	17.1%	13th	11th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	42.0%	32th	36th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.02	55th	58th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	9.48	80th	75th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	71.9%	11th	13th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	51.0%	4th	5th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 18.0 of 35.0 FTE.
Equity index	20.8	53th	49th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	20.2%	49th	55th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 1.1% of income; Part B varied by 79.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,095) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	721	670	92.9%
Other services	328	235	71.6%
Advocacy and legal services	183	108	59.0%
Family services	137	50	36.5%
Housing and home modifications	131	89	67.9%
IL skills training	77	44	57.1%
Vocational services	52	2	3.8%
Transportation	34	12	35.3%
Youth transition	29	14	48.3%
Preventive services	20	8	40.0%
Communication services	18	14	77.8%
Peer counseling	15	13	86.7%
Recreational services	11	9	81.8%
Assistive technology	6	0	0.0%
Mobility training	6	5	83.3%
Counseling and related services	5	3	60.0%
Children's services	1	0	0.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,775	1,277	71.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Vocational services: 2 of 52 requests filled (3.8%).
Transportation: 12 of 34 requests filled (35.3%).
Family services: 50 of 137 requests filled (36.5%).
Preventive services: 8 of 20 requests filled (40.0%).
Youth transition: 14 of 29 requests filled (48.3%).
IL skills training: 44 of 77 requests filled (57.1%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	55	17	29
Communication	48	6	31
Mobility and transportation	15	6	9
Community-based living	983	60	781
Educational	118	8	98
Vocational	54	1	50
Self-care	16	5	6
Information access and technology	11	7	4
Personal resource management	186	118	54
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	73	11	40
Community and social participation	62	24	30
Other	68	25	34

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	10
5 to 19	266
20 to 24	71
25 to 59	396
60 and older	338
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	385
Mental or emotional	59
Physical	227
Hearing	10
Vision	10
Multiple disabilities	362
Other	28

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 133 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	699	73.7%	53.5%	1.38
Black or African American	62	6.5%	15.0%	0.44
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.5%	0.6%	0.88
Asian	5	0.5%	5.2%	0.10
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	4	0.4%	0.1%	7.70
Two or more races	2	0.2%	7.8%	0.03
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	171	18.0%	17.9%	1.01

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.