Disability Resource Agency for Independent Living

What the center reported

940Consumers served184 carried over, 756 new
1,713Information and referral contacts
$1,662,802Total income
$0Part B
$474,843Part C
736Goals achievedof 1,152 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$474,843
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$319,742
State government funds	$695,753
Local government funds	$14,554
Private and other	$157,910
Total income	$1,662,802

Eight years of reports

Disability Resource Agency for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	358	$832,534	$0	$331,103	2
2017	680	$907,507	$0	$373,089	2
2018	512	$903,308	$0	$420,151	1
2019	626	$1,140,740	$0	$432,769	0
2020	949	$1,156,020	$0	$432,769	0
2021	418	$1,162,434	$0	$432,000	160
2022	744	$1,415,555	$0	$437,106	15
2023	940	$1,662,802	$0	$474,843	1

Consumers served, by year

2016358
2017680
2018512
2019626
2020949
2021418
2022744
2023940

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,769	76th	79th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,259	76th	72th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	63.9%	66th	64th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.6%	61th	52th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.11	24th	24th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.21	23th	24th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	62.9%	6th	8th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	83.0%	74th	72th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	82.0%	59th	68th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 11.0 FTE.
Equity index	18.5	61th	55th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	22.9%	40th	42th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 28.6% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,713) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	637	447	70.2%
Assistive technology	183	57	31.1%
Communication services	56	53	94.6%
Housing and home modifications	42	16	38.1%
Advocacy and legal services	36	19	52.8%
Children's services	31	21	67.7%
Vocational services	27	25	92.6%
Personal assistance	18	14	77.8%
Preventive services	14	3	21.4%
Transportation	6	5	83.3%
Peer counseling	5	2	40.0%
Other services	4	4	100.0%
Youth transition	3	2	66.7%
Counseling and related services	2	1	50.0%
Mobility training	2	0	0.0%
Recreational services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,070	673	62.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Preventive services: 3 of 14 requests filled (21.4%).
Assistive technology: 57 of 183 requests filled (31.1%).
Housing and home modifications: 16 of 42 requests filled (38.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 19 of 36 requests filled (52.8%).
Children's services: 21 of 31 requests filled (67.7%).
IL skills training: 447 of 637 requests filled (70.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	97	69	10
Communication	35	32	0
Mobility and transportation	56	16	18
Community-based living	32	13	11
Educational	101	82	12
Vocational	2	1	0
Self-care	71	41	10
Information access and technology	133	55	66
Personal resource management	598	410	75
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	1	5
Community and social participation	15	13	1
Other	5	3	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	9
5 to 19	71
20 to 24	62
25 to 59	508
60 and older	290
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	136
Mental or emotional	123
Physical	346
Hearing	19
Vision	15
Multiple disabilities	301
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 42 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	457	50.9%	42.3%	1.20
Black or African American	62	6.9%	6.4%	1.09
American Indian or Alaska Native	13	1.4%	1.2%	1.20
Asian	13	1.4%	10.2%	0.14
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	14	1.6%	0.4%	4.38
Two or more races	20	2.2%	11.9%	0.19
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	319	35.5%	27.6%	1.29

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.