Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

343Consumers served79 carried over, 264 new
5,137Information and referral contacts
$3,622,350Total income
$0Part B
$294,678Part C
194Goals achievedof 444 set
6Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$294,678
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$644,840
State government funds	$937,298
Local government funds	$315,335
Private and other	$1,430,199
Total income	$3,622,350

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	191	$231,450	$0	$231,450	1
2017	190	$231,530	$0	$231,530	1
2018	162	$260,736	$0	$260,736	2
2019	76	$1,138,436	$0	$268,567	3
2020	40	$528,588	$0	$268,567	0
2021	180	$1,016,728	$0	$268,090	0
2022	206	$1,884,246	$0	$271,259	1
2023	343	$3,622,350	$0	$294,678	6

Consumers served, by year

2016191
2017190
2018162
201976
202040
2021180
2022206
2023343

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$10,561	11th	37th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$18,672	18th	37th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	43.7%	41th	38th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	59.8%	45th	54th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.75	67th	71th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.04	57th	47th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	82.0%	72th	84th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 9 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	68.0%	33th	56th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 21.0 of 31.0 FTE.
Equity index	26.8	39th	32th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	97.9%	2th	3th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 8.1% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5,137) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	133	133	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	74	74	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	71	71	100.0%
Peer counseling	61	61	100.0%
IL skills training	58	58	100.0%
Vocational services	43	43	100.0%
Transportation	34	34	100.0%
Mobility training	32	32	100.0%
Youth transition	32	32	100.0%
Preventive services	18	18	100.0%
Other services	10	10	100.0%
Communication services	7	7	100.0%
Personal assistance	5	5	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	583	583	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 74 of 74 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 133 of 133 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 71 of 71 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 58 of 58 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 32 of 32 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 61 of 61 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	8	5	1
Mobility and transportation	12	5	5
Community-based living	123	37	9
Educational	10	4	4
Vocational	41	23	3
Self-care	44	12	7
Information access and technology	173	99	7
Personal resource management	11	1	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	11	6	1
Community and social participation	9	2	4
Other	2	0	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	3
20 to 24	27
25 to 59	148
60 and older	165
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	59
Mental or emotional	27
Physical	180
Hearing	6
Vision	16
Multiple disabilities	44
Other	11

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 26 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	131	41.3%	42.3%	0.98
Black or African American	102	32.2%	6.4%	5.06
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	1.3%	1.2%	1.05
Asian	27	8.5%	10.2%	0.84
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	4	1.3%	0.4%	3.55
Two or more races	17	5.4%	11.9%	0.45
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	32	10.1%	27.6%	0.37

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.